pons-voting-kp.netlify.app is an impersonation phishing page dressed up as an on-chain governance vote for pons. Its title, "Vote 0x4B...1E18 — pons", presents it as a ballot on a specific proposal, the kind of link circulated to token holders in community channels. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-15. The site has been offline since 2026-09-16, and as of 2026-10-19 the root returns no content.
How the scam works
Fake voting pages exploit the urgency around governance. Holders are told a proposal is live and that they must connect a wallet to cast their vote. The "vote" is the trap. Instead of a harmless signature, the victim is typically asked to approve token spending or sign a permit, which hands the operator the ability to move the assets. Because the page imitates pons branding and quotes a proposal-style identifier, the request can look like a routine part of participating.
Evidence
Wallet-security blocklists caught this page. Besides PhishDestroy, it is listed by MetaMask, whose warning reaches users at the moment they try to open it, and by SEAL. General antivirus coverage was thin. On 2026-09-17, VirusTotal showed 3 of 89 engines flagging it: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and VIPRE. A low count like that is normal for a short-lived crypto lure and does not mean the page was safe.
Infrastructure
The page sat on a free Netlify subdomain rather than a registered domain. This kind of throwaway setup costs nothing and can be replaced within minutes once it is reported. Traffic resolved to Amazon infrastructure in Germany. The DigiCert certificate is the platform's standard one, so the padlock only shows the connection was encrypted, not that the page was genuine. It went dark one day after PhishDestroy first saw it, which fits a campaign that rotates hosts quickly.
What to do
If you only opened the page, no action is needed beyond avoiding links that claim to host pons votes. If you connected a wallet and signed or approved anything, check your token approvals with a trusted revocation tool and revoke any you do not recognise. Move remaining funds to a fresh wallet if you suspect a permit signature. Reach governance only through the project's official site and announced channels. Defenders should block the hostname and watch for similar "voting" subdomains on free hosting platforms.
IoC Extractionscanned 2026年9月16日1 wallet · 0 Telegram IoC
Submitted URLhttp://pons-voting-kp.netlify.app/
Observed page title
Vote 0x4B...1E18 — pons
TLS証明書
発行者 DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Network & certificates
Stored technical evidence
Network & DNS
Shared CDN edge
Resolved IP
63.176.8.218
Network ASN
AS16509
Organization
AWS EC2 (eu-central-1)
Observed location
Frankfurt, DE
Server header
Netlify
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
Location describes the IP network.
TLS証明書
Issuer
DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
