pons-voting-g0.netlify.app was an impersonation phishing page dressed up as a governance vote for pons. Its title, "Vote 0x03...9E1b — pons", mimicked a proposal or ballot page, which targets token holders and community members who expect to vote with their wallets. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-15. It went offline on 2026-09-16, and as of 2026-10-19 the address is dead with nothing served at the root.
How the scam works
Fake voting pages rely on urgency and legitimacy. A holder sees what looks like an official ballot, with a shortened address-style identifier in the title like a real proposal, and is asked to connect a wallet to cast a vote. The vote button then triggers a wallet prompt. That prompt can be a token approval, a permit signature or a transaction rather than a harmless vote, and once confirmed it lets the operator move the victim's assets. Because governance votes often do require a signature, victims have little reason to question the request.
Evidence
MetaMask and SEAL both list the domain alongside PhishDestroy. That gives two independent wallet-security sources backing the impersonation classification. VirusTotal tells a different story, with 0 of 89 engines flagging it on 2026-09-17. That scan came a day after the page had already gone dark, so a clean result here says more about how short-lived the page was than about whether it was safe.
Infrastructure
The page sat on a free Netlify subdomain, so there was no domain to register and it could be launched and discarded within hours. The window between first sighting and going offline was about one day, a typical disposable-campaign pattern. Traffic resolved to Amazon infrastructure in Germany, which is Netlify's ordinary delivery network. The DigiCert certificate is Netlify's standard one, so the padlock showed only that the connection was encrypted and nothing about who ran the page.
What to do
If you connected a wallet to this page, review its token approvals and permissions in a revocation tool and cancel anything you do not recognise, especially approvals granted around 2026-09-15. If you signed a transaction or permit, move the remaining funds to a fresh wallet whose seed phrase has never touched that browser. Treat every vote link from a direct message or social reply as suspect, and reach pons governance only through its official, bookmarked channels. Defenders should block the hostname and watch for sibling Netlify subdomains using the same pons voting lure.
IoC Extractionscanned 2026年9月16日1 wallet · 0 Telegram IoC
Submitted URLhttp://pons-voting-g0.netlify.app/
Observed page title
Vote 0x03...9E1b — pons
TLS証明書
発行者 DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Network & certificates
Stored technical evidence
Network & DNS
Shared CDN edge
Resolved IP
63.176.8.218
Network ASN
AS16509
Organization
AWS EC2 (eu-central-1)
Observed location
Frankfurt, DE
Server header
Netlify
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
Location describes the IP network.
TLS証明書
Issuer
DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
