pons-voting-3i.netlify.app is an impersonation phishing page that posed as a voting portal for Pons. Its title, "Vote 0x39...4571 — pons", presented it as an on-chain proposal or delegate vote, which targets token holders and community members who expect governance links. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-15. It went offline on 2026-09-16, and as of 2026-10-19 the root returns no content.
How the scam works
Fake governance pages rely on urgency. A link circulates in chats or replies, claiming a vote is closing or that participation earns rewards. To cast a ballot, the visitor must connect a wallet and approve a request. Instead of a harmless vote signature, a page like this can ask for token approvals or signed permits that let the operator move assets. The truncated address in the title imitates a real proposal or delegate reference so that the request looks routine.
Evidence
VirusTotal returned 3 detections out of 89 engines on 2026-09-17, from alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and VIPRE. That count is low, partly because the scan ran after the page had already gone dark. The stronger signal comes from wallet-focused blocklists. MetaMask and SEAL list the domain alongside PhishDestroy, so MetaMask users should see a warning if the page returns.
Infrastructure
The page sat on a free Netlify subdomain, served from Amazon infrastructure in Germany. Throwaway platform subdomains like this cost nothing, deploy in seconds and are easy to abandon. That fits a page that lasted roughly a day after PhishDestroy spotted it. Its DigiCert certificate is Netlify's standard platform certificate, so the padlock says nothing about who operated the site.
What to do
If you connected a wallet here, check its token approvals and permit signatures with a reputable revocation tool. Revoke anything you do not recognise, and move remaining funds to a fresh wallet if you signed anything. Never vote through links shared in DMs or replies. Reach governance only through the project's official site or a verified voting platform. Defenders should block the domain, watch for sibling Netlify subdomains with similar "voting" names, and report new copies to Netlify and the wallet blocklists.
IoC Extractionscanned 2026年9月16日1 wallet · 0 Telegram IoC
Submitted URLhttp://pons-voting-3i.netlify.app/
Observed page title
Vote 0x39...4571 — pons
TLS証明書
発行者 DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Network & certificates
Stored technical evidence
Network & DNS
Shared CDN edge
Resolved IP
35.157.26.135
Network ASN
AS16509
Organization
AWS EC2 (eu-central-1)
Observed location
Frankfurt, DE
Server header
Netlify
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
Location describes the IP network.
TLS証明書
Issuer
DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Collection source
PhishDestroy collector
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
