VirusTotal
6 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く“Polycolo”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@ufocorp.net.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 13 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
フィッシング: polycolo.com — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 6/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft); Spamhaus…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
6 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開くSuspicious
レポートを開くDBL_SPAM
Scan report
レポートを開く3 community references
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
polycolo.com is an impersonation phishing site that presents itself under the name Polycolo, borrowing a trusted identity so visitors lower their guard. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-06, less than two weeks after the domain was registered. As of 2026-10-19 the site is still online and serving its content, so anyone sent to it today can still reach the live page.
Impersonation pages copy the look, wording and branding of a service people already trust. The page title, Polycolo, is the only brand signal the site shows. Victims usually arrive through ads, social posts or direct messages, then are asked to sign in, verify an account or enter sensitive details. Whatever they type, such as passwords, one-time codes, personal data or wallet secrets, goes straight to the operators. They can then take over the account or empty it.
VirusTotal shows 6 of 92 engines flagging the domain as of 2026-10-11: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. That count is modest, so most security tools will not warn a visitor yet. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as spam, which suggests it is being pushed through unsolicited messaging. Three AlienVault OTX pulses reference it, so other researchers have tracked it independently alongside PhishDestroy's own blocklist entry.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-23 through TuringSign Inc. d/b/a Cosmotown and was caught on 2026-10-06, a 13-day gap that fits a freshly built phishing domain launched quickly. It resolves to 109.238.87.170 on the SERVER-MANIA (B2 Net Solutions Inc.) network, hosted in the US. The site uses a free, automatically issued Let's Encrypt certificate. The padlock in the browser only means the connection is encrypted and says nothing about whether the site is genuine.
If you entered a password on polycolo.com, change it right away on the real service and on any other account that uses the same password. Turn on two-factor authentication and sign out of all active sessions. If you entered a recovery phrase or private key, treat that wallet as compromised and move your funds to a new wallet created on a clean device. Watch your accounts for logins, changes or transfers you did not make, and report them to the genuine provider. Defenders should block the domain and its IP at DNS, proxy and mail gateways, and search logs for users who visited the site.
a.dnspod.comb.dnspod.comc.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
49dac7e5283fa28bee27163c7cd9d03c9038f439ec1e1b466df2b097eabe5a28Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of polycolo.com · checked Oct 6, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source6/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261007-5A1A51
3 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcepolycolo.com
View source保存された類似ドメイン:170 件
170 件中 100 件を表示
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
polycolo.com
PD-20261007-5A1A51 Recipient: abuse@ufocorp.net アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
polycolo.com)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.