Analysis indicates that plasma.credit was actively serving a credential‑harvesting page titled “Plasma” before being taken offline. The domain resolves to the IP address 188.114.96.3, which belongs to AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc., and is protected by Cloudflare’s DNS service (konnor.ns.cloudflare.com, mckenzie.ns.cloudflare.com). The site employed HTTP/3 and presented an SSL certificate issued by Google Trust Services under the WE1 root, confirming the use of a valid TLS chain. Detection telemetry shows that the domain was listed on a single security blocklist and was blocked by the PhishDestroy service.
VirusTotal scans recorded five positive detections out of ninety‑five scanners, reinforcing the malicious classification. The registrar information lists Cloudflare, Inc. as the registration entity, consistent with the observed hosting infrastructure. Current status is offline, and the risk level is elevated.
Defenders should continue to block the domain at perimeter and DNS layers, monitor the associated IP 188.114.96.3 for any re‑use, and review any outbound connections that may have targeted the site while it was active. Because the page content has not been captured, further forensic analysis of the payload is not possible, and the exact phishing campaign details remain unknown. Ongoing vigilance is advised, including periodic re‑query of threat intel feeds for any resurgence of the domain or related infrastructure.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月29日score 63/1002 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://plasma.credit/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-21 01:09:46 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-02-14 16:36:57 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-02-14 16:36:57 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 5,471.63hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-06-08 16:25:56 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 2 identified
Cloudflare
CDN
Web infrastructure and security company providing CDN, DDoS mitigation, and DNS services.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
