The domain phantomwall.exchange has been identified as a high-risk phishing site actively impersonating the Phantom brand. It appears to be employed in a brand impersonation campaign, leveraging a fake login or similar phishing technique to harvest credentials or sensitive data from users expecting legitimate Phantom services. No specific drainer kit is detailed, but the threat activity aligns with typical brand impersonation tactics.
Technical analysis reveals that the domain was registered through Eranet International Limited and resolves to the IP address 162.241.85.94, located in the United States under AS46606 Unified Layer. The domain was created on May 27, 2026, and has been detected by 9 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal. It is currently listed in three security blocklists and utilizes a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate. Additionally, it is blocked by several anti-phishing services, including PhishDestroy and other blockchain-related security services.
The domain is currently active, posing a significant threat to users of the Phantom brand. Immediate action is recommended, including adding the domain to additional blocklists and informing potential victims. Continued monitoring is essential to detect any changes in its status or associated infrastructure. Users are advised to verify URLs and ensure they are interacting with legitimate services to mitigate the risk of credential theft or data compromise.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='phantomwall.exchange', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnection
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年6月18日score 100/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://phantomwall.exchange/
Favicon Hash
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:10:59 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-07-21 22:10:41 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-07-21 22:10:41 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 1,698.07hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-26 07:12:48 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 6 identified
W
WordPress
CMSBlogs
WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.
あなたの仮想通貨取引所 — notify its fraud team immediately; it may be able to preserve records or restrict funds held on its platform
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
