VirusTotal
11 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“overleaf.ai - Automate your Content Production and Cold Outreach.”
フィッシング: overleaf.agency — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 307). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 11/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet); 1…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
11 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く23 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Overleaf.agency is currently active and appears to be a brand‑impersonation campaign targeting the Across brand. The domain was registered on 04 December 2025 through NameCheap, Inc. and resolves to the Amazon Web Services IP address 216.198.79.1, which belongs to ASN 16509 (Amazon.com, Inc.) and is geolocated in the United States. The TLS certificate is issued by Let’s Encrypt (R12), providing only standard encryption without extended validation. An HTTP 307 response is observed, indicating a temporary redirect, and the site advertises the page title “overleaf.ai – Automate your Content Production and Cold Outreach,” which does not reference the impersonated brand but suggests a marketing‑oriented landing page. Infrastructure analysis shows the domain is hosted on Vercel, a popular serverless platform, and the presence of HSTS and Calendly scripts suggests attempts to establish persistent HTTPS and schedule interactions.
The domain’s MX records are both set to priority 10 and point to eforward2.registrar‑servers.com, a generic registrar‑provided mail host, indicating no dedicated mail infrastructure. Nameservers dns1.registrar‑servers.com and dns2.registrar‑servers.com are also registrar‑default. Reputation data indicates the domain is listed on two security blocklists—PhishDestroy and ScamSniffer—both of which classify it as a crypto‑related scam. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 / 100, and VirusTotal reports that 2 of 95 scanning engines flag the domain, reinforcing the malicious assessment. The combination of a newly created domain, low trust score, blocklist listings, and the mismatch between the page title and the claimed brand target points to a high‑risk impersonation operation.
Uncertainties remain regarding the exact payload delivered after the HTTP 307 redirect, the presence of any credential‑collection forms, and the full scope of the crypto‑scam mechanics.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
dns1.registrar-servers.comdns2.registrar-servers.comeforward2.registrar-servers.compriority 10eforward3.registrar-servers.compriority 10eforward1.registrar-servers.compriority 10eforward4.registrar-servers.compriority 15eforward5.registrar-servers.compriority 20Location describes the IP network.
f2f4c01c2987ad40bce4f68290a4249ceb62df4833c6d0eac900343d55a65624Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of overleaf.agency · checked Mar 6, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
overleaf.agency
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
到達可能→利用不可
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
利用不可→到達可能
到達可能→利用不可
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
No threat flag
View source23 community references
View source11/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceoverleaf.agency
View sourceコミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2025年12月13日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
overleaf.agency)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.