VirusTotal
6 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開くMetaMaskなりすまし: net-hook.com — 到達可能・アクセス制限あり (HTTP 403). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 6/91 (ChainPatrol, BitDefender, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Kaspersky)…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
6 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開くSuspicious
レポートを開くDBL_PHISH
4 community references
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
net-hook.com is an impersonation phishing site that poses as a legitimate service to steal from crypto users. MetaMask, SEAL and ChainPatrol all list it, which points to wallet holders as the intended victims. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-29. The site went offline on 2026-09-30, its content was blocked at the provider level, and it was still dead when rechecked on 2026-10-19.
Impersonation pages copy the look of a trusted brand so visitors act without stopping to verify. They might type a seed phrase or password, or approve a wallet request. The page title showed only "Loading…", a generic placeholder rather than a brand name, even though we classify the site as impersonation. A visitor who follows the fake prompts can give attackers control of an account or wallet, and stolen crypto is rarely recoverable.
Six of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain on 2026-09-29: ChainPatrol, BitDefender, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Kaspersky and SOCRadar. That is a small count, but it includes a crypto-specialist scanner alongside major endpoint vendors. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as phishing. MetaMask and SEAL carry it on their blocklists, so many wallet users would see a warning before the page loads. Four AlienVault OTX threat pulses also reference it.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-09 through Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a Trustname.com. It was detected 20 days later and dead the day after, the short lifespan typical of disposable phishing domains. It sat behind Cloudflare, Inc. with a Canadian-geolocated address. That setup masks the real origin server, so takedown requests go through the network provider. Its Google Trust Services certificate is automatically issued, so the browser padlock proved nothing about legitimacy.
If you entered a seed phrase or private key on net-hook.com, treat that wallet as compromised. Move any remaining funds to a new wallet created on a clean device. If you connected a wallet or signed anything, review and revoke token approvals you do not recognize. If you entered a password, change it everywhere you reused it and turn on app-based 2FA. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level and hunt for earlier visits in logs. They should also watch for lookalike domains registered through the same channels.
Last checked
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
burt.ns.cloudflare.comcheryl.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
ba1606feae10c0eed66392de032967c87664e67d9e495e5fca2a5985c6889188Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of net-hook.com · checked Sep 29, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
到達可能→利用不可
0→6
到達可能
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source6/91 engine detections
View sourcenet-hook.com
View sourcePage captured
View source保存された類似ドメイン:79 件
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
net-hook.com
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
net-hook.com)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.