VirusTotal
2 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く“Exchange”
ブロックリスト掲載ドメイン: neaprimes.com — 到達可能・アクセス制限あり (HTTP 403). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 2/89 (Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 76/100. レジストラ…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
2 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く2 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開く80/100
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
neaprimes.com is an impersonation phishing page that presented itself simply as "Exchange", posing as a cryptocurrency trading platform to draw in retail traders. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-07. The site has been offline since 2026-10-10, and as of 2026-10-19 its content is blocked at the provider level, so it no longer loads.
Sites like this copy the look of a legitimate exchange and wait for visitors to trust it with money or credentials. Victims are usually pushed to register, log in, or fund an account, and anything deposited goes straight to the operators. A familiar follow-up is a dashboard showing fake balances or profits, with withdrawals blocked until the victim pays a "fee", "tax" or "verification deposit" that is also stolen. Any login and two-factor codes typed into the page can also be reused against the victim's real exchange accounts.
Independent detection is thin. On 2026-09-21, only 2 of 89 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and SOCRadar. It appears in two AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which shows other researchers were tracking it. Among blocklists, PhishDestroy is the only one listing it, so most browsers and wallets would not have warned visitors before it went down.
The domain was registered on 2026-06-27 through Cloudflare, Inc. It ran for roughly ten weeks before PhishDestroy caught it, a long window for a fake exchange to collect deposits. Traffic was served through Cloudflare's network, geolocated to Canada. That address belongs to Cloudflare's proxy and hides the real origin server.
If you sent crypto to an account on neaprimes.com, assume it is gone. Do not pay any "withdrawal fee" or "unlock" charge, and ignore anyone who contacts you offering to recover the funds, because recovery offers are a common second scam. Record transaction hashes and receiving addresses and report them to your exchange and local police. If you reused a password there, change it everywhere, reset 2FA on your real exchange accounts and review their login history. Defenders should block the domain, search proxy and DNS logs for visits since 2026-06-27, and watch for look-alike domains using the same "Exchange" branding.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
kianchau.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
a0dbe38d94f7a1957b8a01e99f43cd2c50fffc4637a6712ef34b24338d9ba14dneaprimes.comSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of neaprimes.com · checked Sep 15, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
cloudflare_ban: raw=cf_phishing_block; http=403; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare; provider_error=cloudflare_phishing_interstitial
neaprimes.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
redirected→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
到達可能→利用不可
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
No threat flag
View source2/89 engine detections
View source2 community references
View sourceneaprimes.com
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
neaprimes.com)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.