PhishDestroy identifies meebits.futbol as an active crypto drainer domain currently under investigation for brand impersonation tactics. This domain mimics the Meebits NFT brand to deceive users into connecting crypto wallets or revealing seed phrases. Visitors risk immediate asset theft through malicious smart contract interactions disguised as legitimate mints or airdrops. Domain intelligence shows zero detections on VirusTotal despite active hosting linked to a high-risk IP address (54.215.31.113). This domain was registered through Dynadot Inc on February 19, 2026, using a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate to appear trustworthy. With current VirusTotal results at 1/95 and no blocklist flags, it remains undetected on major security platforms. The domain’s short registration age and clean SSL audit suggest a newly deployed threat designed to bypass early-stage scam detection filters. Analysts are actively monitoring behavior, but attacker infrastructure remains unblocked at the network level. Users who visited meebits.futbol should immediately disconnect any connected wallets and revoke any unauthorized permissions through platforms like Etherscan or Revoke.cash. Scan devices for malware and monitor transaction history for suspicious outbound transfers. Report the domain to your antivirus vendor and consider using DNS filtering tools like NextDNS or OpenDNS to block future access. Avoid interacting with any wallet prompts or site functions on this domain until confirmed safe by security advisories.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Latest HTTP observationRedirectingHTTP redirect observed80%2026-10-21 01:57:17 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-21 01:57:17 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 9 identified
N
Node.js
Programming languages
JavaScript runtime built on Chrome V8 engine for server-side development.
R
React
JavaScript frameworks
JavaScript library for building user interfaces with component-based architecture.
A
Amazon Web Services
PaaSIaaS
Cloud computing platform offering compute, storage, and networking services.
N
Next.js
JavaScript frameworksSSR
React framework for production with hybrid static and server rendering.
Cloudflare Browser Insights
AnalyticsRUM
Performance monitoring tool that measures website speed from real users.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
