VirusTotal
5 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“Google ReCaptcha”
Mantaなりすまし: manta-io.digital — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 5/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 65/100.…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
5 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開くno community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain manta-io.digital is a confirmed phishing site engaged in brand impersonation targeting Manta, a known cryptocurrency platform. It poses an elevated risk by mimicking legitimate Manta services to deceive users into disclosing sensitive information or credentials. No crypto drainer kit was identified, but the site was actively used for credential phishing before being taken offline.
Technical analysis shows manta-io.digital was flagged by 2 of 95 VirusTotal security vendors, including Gridinsoft and SOCRadar, with a Gridinsoft trust score of 0/100. It appears on 1 security blocklist (PhishDestroy) and was registered through Global Domain Group LLC on December 30, 2025. The domain resolved to IP address 172.67.179.33, hosted on Cloudflare's network (AS13335) in the US, with nameservers kehlani.ns.cloudflare.com and rustam.ns.cloudflare.com. No SSL certificate was present, and the observed page title was 'Google ReCaptcha'.
Users who interacted with manta-io.digital should immediately change passwords for any accounts accessed through the site, enable two-factor authentication (2FA), and monitor for unauthorized transactions or identity fraud. Report the domain to platforms like Google Safe Browsing, PhishTank, or the Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG). If cryptocurrency was involved, review wallet activity for suspicious approvals, though no drainer kit was detected in this case.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
kehlani.ns.cloudflare.comrustam.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='manta-io.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErro
manta-io.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/568736bc-a2db-4a0a-ab41-97405dd5a0a3
5/91 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View sourcemanta-io.digital
View sourceコミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2026年1月2日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
manta-io.digital)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.