VirusTotal
1 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く“MANDEM — Onchain Drill Culture on Base”
Baseなりすまし: mandem-eem.pages.dev — 到達可能・アクセス制限あり (HTTP 403). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 1/89 (LevelBlue); PhishDestroy score 76/100. レジストラ: Cloudflare Pages.
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
1 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開くno community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
mandem-eem.pages.dev is an impersonation phishing page that presented itself as "MANDEM — Onchain Drill Culture on Base". It borrowed the identity of a community crypto project on the Base network to reach that project's followers and token holders. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-05. The site has been offline since 2026-09-16, and the hosting provider blocked its content, which was still the case on 2026-10-19.
The page title presents a culture-driven Base project rather than an obvious scam, and we classified the site as impersonation. Pages like this copy a project's name and branding, then push visitors toward an action framed as official, such as a claim, mint, airdrop or presale. That action usually means connecting a wallet and signing a transaction or approval. Victims lose whatever that signature authorizes: tokens, NFTs or funds sent to the operator, rather than anything from the real MANDEM community.
Independent detection was thin. On 2026-09-17, only LevelBlue among 89 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain, so most automated scanners never caught it. The PhishDestroy blocklist is currently its only listing. The provider's decision to block the content adds outside confirmation that the page broke the platform's rules.
The subdomain was created on Cloudflare Pages on 2026-09-04, and PhishDestroy caught it within a day. That quick turnaround fits disposable sites spun up on free hosting to ride a project's moment of attention. It ran on Cloudflare, Inc. infrastructure with an address geolocated to Canada, behind a free Google Trust Services certificate. That certificate gave it the padlock without saying anything about who ran it. It stayed live for about eleven days before going dark.
If you connected a wallet or signed anything on this page, use a token approval checker to revoke any allowances you granted. If you entered a seed phrase, move all remaining assets to a newly created wallet right away, because the old one should be treated as compromised. Reach MANDEM only through channels the project itself announces, and be suspicious of claim or mint links shared in replies or DMs. Defenders should block the domain and watch for new Pages subdomains that reuse the MANDEM name or its "Onchain Drill Culture" tagline.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
0xB200000000000000000000c10CfD4D93BBDD6601Format validated · Domain analysisIoC extraction recorded 2026-09-21 04:01:16 UTC
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
Location describes the IP network.
445c0946e1027790d52a161fa1a1601d2d616611debc4edba093537bf8a36033Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of mandem-eem.pages.dev · checked Sep 15, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
cloudflare_ban: raw=cf_phishing_block; http=403; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare; provider_error=cloudflare_phishing_interstitial
mandem-eem.pages.dev
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
到達可能→利用不可
到達可能
No threat flag
View source1/89 engine detections
View sourcemandem-eem.pages.dev
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
mandem-eem.pages.dev)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.