VirusTotal
7 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く“Официальное зеркало Kraken Onion через Tor. Безопасный вход.”
Krakenなりすまし: kraken-darknet-ssilka.ru — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 7/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
7 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開くDBL_PHISH
4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
kraken-darknet-ssilka.ru is an impersonation phishing page built around the Kraken name. Its Russian page title, "Официальное зеркало Kraken Onion через Tor. Безопасный вход.", translates to "Official Kraken Onion mirror via Tor. Secure login." The domain itself reads as "kraken darknet link," so it targets Russian-speaking users who search the open web for a working Kraken onion address. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-25, and it was still online with live content on 2026-10-19.
Sites like this one exploit the fact that onion services are hard to find. Users therefore search for "mirrors" and trust whatever ranks well. The page claims to be the official, secure entry point and presents a login form. Anything typed into it, including usernames, passwords and any codes, goes to the operators. They can use those details to take over the real account, empty any balance held there, or push the victim toward a fake deposit page that pays the scammers directly.
On 2026-10-07, VirusTotal showed 7 of 92 engines flagging the domain: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar and VIPRE. That count is modest, so many browsers and filters will still let it load. Spamhaus lists it in its DBL as a phishing domain, which is significant because many mail and DNS filters use that list. Four AlienVault OTX threat pulses reference it, and it is on the PhishDestroy blocklist.
The domain was registered on 2026-03-26 through RU-CENTER, roughly six months before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap suggests a domain kept in reserve or quietly built up for search traffic before it drew attention. It resolves to Cloudflare, Inc. address space geolocated to Canada, so the real origin server is hidden behind Cloudflare's proxy. The padlock comes from a free Let's Encrypt certificate, which only encrypts the connection and says nothing about whether the "secure login" claim is true.
If you entered credentials on this page, change the password on the genuine account immediately. Change it anywhere else you reused it, and reset any two-factor setup you may have exposed. Do not deposit funds or follow payment instructions shown after logging in, and treat any balance displayed there as fake. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level, add it to mail filtering, and report it to Cloudflare and RU-CENTER with the page title as evidence.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
amos.ns.cloudflare.comkay.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
95183a88efeb6acbae88e97134271673a62359f0efa43efd1ccbf4f25271fcc9Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of kraken-darknet-ssilka.ru · checked Sep 25, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
kraken-darknet-ssilka.ru
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
2→3
1→2
0→1
到達可能
No threat flag
View source7/92 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcekraken-darknet-ssilka.ru
View source保存された類似ドメイン:114 件
114 件中 100 件を表示
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
kraken-darknet-ssilka.ru)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.