PhishDestroy identifies kofferk.online as a newly registered domain engaged in generic phishing activities. This domain does not appear to impersonate a specific brand or leverage a known drainer kit, suggesting opportunistic credential harvesting or fraudulent transactions. The threat vector remains broad, targeting unsuspecting users through deceptive online services or fake e-commerce platforms. Given the lack of association with a well-known brand or established phishing infrastructure, the risk profile is currently classified as generic but warrants close monitoring due to its recent creation and active SSL certificate. This domain resolves to IP address 188.114.97.3 and was registered through NAMECHEAP INC on March 08, 2026. VirusTotal currently flags the domain with 0 detections out of 95 scanners, indicating it has not yet been widely recognized as malicious. The SSL certificate, issued by Google Trust Services, adds a layer of perceived legitimacy, potentially increasing the effectiveness of phishing campaigns. As of this analysis, kofferk.online has not been listed on major blocklists, further highlighting the need for proactive detection measures. The domain remains in an active status under investigation, with no immediate blocklist presence or detections despite its suspicious attributes. PhishDestroy recommends immediate avoidance of this domain and advises users who have interacted with it to review credentials, monitor financial accounts, and report suspicious activity. The low initial detection rate suggests this phishing domain may escalate in threat level as more intelligence is gathered. Users should remain vigilant and report any encounters to enhance collective threat intelligence. Remaining risk is assessed as under investigation but poses potential harm to unwary users.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationコンテンツ公開中Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-19 22:30:43 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:30:43 UTClast content: 2026-10-19 22:30:43 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 4 identified
Facebook Pixel
Analytics
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
