VirusTotal
17 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く“Justo Bitline Review | Automated Trading Robot”
フィッシング: justo-bitline-system.com — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 17/89 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, CyRadar); URLQuery 5 alerts; CF…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
17 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く5 threat-system alerts
レポートを開く悪意あり
レポートを開く5 community references
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DigiCert UltraDNS | justo-bitline-system.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| OpenDNS | justo-bitline-system.com |
phishing | Phishing Block |
| Quad9 DNS | justo-bitline-system.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| DNS4EU | justo-bitline-system.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| Cloudflare DNS | justo-bitline-system.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
justo-bitline-system.com is an impersonation phishing page built around the name Justo Bitline. It was presented as a review of an automated trading robot and aimed at people looking for passive crypto or forex income. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-18. The site has been offline since 2026-09-26, and its DNS was still inactive at the last check on 2026-10-19.
The page title, "Justo Bitline Review | Automated Trading Robot", shows the standard lure. A page dressed up as an independent review praises a bot that supposedly trades for you, then pushes visitors to sign up and fund an account. Victims usually hand over their name, email and phone number, and are then called by "account managers" who press for a first deposit and later larger top-ups. When someone tries to withdraw, new "fees" or "taxes" appear, and money already deposited is rarely recovered. The title presents the site as a product review, while PhishDestroy classifies it as impersonation phishing.
When VirusTotal scanned the domain on 2026-09-20, 17 of 89 engines flagged it. That is a solid share for a page that had only been on our radar for two days. The detecting vendors include alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, CyRadar, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and Fortinet. The domain also appears in five AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which shows other researchers tracked it independently. It is listed on the PhishDestroy blocklist.
The domain was registered through MainReg Inc. on 2026-01-26, about 235 days before we detected it. That gap suggests it was either kept in reserve or ran quietly before being reported. It sat behind Cloudflare, with a Canadian address, so the real origin server stayed hidden behind the proxy. Its certificate came from Google Trust Services (WE1), the kind issued automatically, so the padlock said nothing about legitimacy.
If you deposited money, contact your bank or card issuer right away to dispute the payments. Do not pay any "withdrawal fee", "tax" or "unlock charge", because these only add to the loss. Expect follow-up calls from the same people or from fake "recovery services" promising to get your funds back, and refuse them. If you shared ID documents or login details, change any reused passwords and watch for identity fraud. File a report with your national fraud authority. Defenders should block the domain and look in mail and web logs for traffic to it, especially sign-up form submissions.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
aurora.ns.cloudflare.comkaiser.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
6f5458419f62b2edb017e836d9cee1209c542c6fa201833d50129afc9eef5e78Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of justo-bitline-system.com · checked Sep 18, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
justo-bitline-system.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
到達可能→利用不可
17→Observation retained
No threat flag
View source17/89 engine detections
View source5 community references
View sourcePD-20260918-941BDE
Page captured
View sourcejusto-bitline-system.com
View sourcePD-20260918-941BDE Recipient: complain@mainreg.com アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
justo-bitline-system.com)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.