The domain jup.giving has been identified as a brand impersonation threat specifically targeting Jupiter, a cryptocurrency platform. Analysis indicates this site operated as a crypto drainer, designed to deceive users into connecting wallets and authorizing transactions that result in unauthorized fund transfers. The domain is currently offline, but prior activity confirms its malicious intent. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain was registered through Web Commerce Communications Limited on November 16, 2025, and resolved to the IP address 57.129.97.29. Detection metrics show the domain was flagged by 8 of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal, with one active entry on security blocklists. The site lacked an SSL certificate, further diminishing its legitimacy. The page title, 'Jupiter | Airdrop,' was crafted to mimic official Jupiter airdrop campaigns, a common tactic in crypto drainer operations. As of the latest assessment, jup.giving has been taken offline, likely due to enforcement actions or abandonment by the threat actor. Users who interacted with this domain are advised to immediately revoke any wallet permissions granted during the interaction. Cryptocurrency holders should verify all airdrop-related communications through official Jupiter channels and employ hardware wallets or isolated browser sessions for sensitive transactions. Monitoring for unauthorized transactions and rotating credentials associated with crypto services is strongly recommended.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年3月24日score 25/1002 brand signals
Submitted URLhttps://jup.giving/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:09:11 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-04 18:35:42 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-04 18:35:42 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 4,293.65hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-03 05:25:18 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='jup.giving', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("SOC
jup.giving
保存済みの結果
到達不能
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(MY)
