ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@identitydigital.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
ネットワークセキュリティインテリジェンス Registrar context
Registrar contextTrustname
Stored registration data identifies Trustname / Fewmoretaps OÜ (IANA 4318) as the registrar. PhishDestroy maintains a separate registrar investigation; that material is contextual and is not an independent detection for this domain.
ip-booter.pro is an impersonation phishing page that targets people looking up IP booters, the stress-testing and DDoS-for-hire tools whose legality the site claims to explain. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-05. It was still online and serving content when last checked on 2026-10-19. The page presents itself as a legal guide titled "Are IP Booters Illegal? Booter Laws in the US, UK & Europe (2026)", while our classification is impersonation phishing.
How the scam works
Impersonation sites borrow the look or authority of a trusted source to earn a visitor's confidence, then steer them toward handing over logins, payment details or personal information. A legal explainer about booter laws draws a specific audience: gamers, server operators and curious users weighing whether such services are safe to use. That audience may be less likely to report a problem or seek help. What a victim loses depends on what they submit: account credentials, money paid for a service that never arrives, or identity details that can be reused in later fraud.
Evidence
Five of 92 security engines on VirusTotal flag the domain as of 2026-10-19: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. That count is low, so many browsers and filters will not warn visitors yet. The flags come from five unrelated vendors rather than a single source, which supports the classification. The domain also appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses, and PhishDestroy lists it on its blocklist.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-07-27 through Fewmoretaps OU, trading as Trustname.com. About six weeks later, PhishDestroy detected it, so the site is a recent registration rather than an established publication with a history. It sits behind Cloudflare, with the serving address placed in Canada, which hides the actual origin server from view. The certificate from Google Trust Services is standard for Cloudflare-fronted sites and proves nothing about who runs it.
What to do
If you entered a password on this site, change it immediately, along with any account that shares the same password, and turn on two-factor authentication. If you paid for anything, contact your bank or payment provider to dispute the charge and watch for follow-up messages using the details you gave. Do not return to the site to recover anything. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level, search web and email logs for earlier visits, and treat its low vendor detection count as a reason to add it manually rather than wait for feeds.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationコンテンツ公開中Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-19 22:30:11 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:35:33 UTClast content: 2026-10-19 22:30:11 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 3 identified
Cloudflare Browser Insights
AnalyticsRUM
Cloudflare Browser Insights is a tool that measures the performance of websites from the perspective of users.
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(BY)
PhishDestroy Investigation
