VirusTotal
2 detections · vendor total unavailable
レポートを開く“Home - International Banking Facilities (IBF)”
ブロックリスト掲載ドメイン: interbfacilities.online — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 2 detections (engine total unavailable) (Fortinet, Netcraft); URLScan malicious…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
2 detections · vendor total unavailable
レポートを開く22/100
レポートを開く1/100
レポートを開く悪意あり
レポートを開くchecked — no detections recorded
レポートを開くchecked — no match recorded
no community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開く14 確認済み — ブロックなし
No threat flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
interbfacilities.online was registered through Namecheap Inc on 11 April 2026. The site resolved to IP 163.61.188.2, which geolocates to the United States and is associated with the MIT network. DNS resolution used four authoritative name servers (dns1.lytehosting.com, dns2.lytehosting.com, dns3.lytehosting.com, dns4.lytehosting.com). The site served an HTTPS certificate issued by Let’s Encrypt (R12) and employed HTTP/3. Technology fingerprints show a PHP backend, Tailwind CSS, LiteSpeed web server, Alpine.js, jsDelivr CDN, and the Chaport live‑chat widget.
The page title returned “Home – International Banking Facilities (IBF)”, suggesting an attempt to impersonate a financial institution. The domain is currently taken offline, and its risk level is marked elevated. Trust scoring services rate the site poorly: Gridinsoft assigns 22/100, Scamadviser assigns 1/100. It appears on one security blocklist and has been blocked by PhishDestroy. VirusTotal scans recorded 2 detections out of 95 participating scanners, confirming malicious behavior.
The limited detection footprint and the lack of additional public intelligence mean that the full phishing campaign details—such as credential‑stealing pages or lure content—remain unknown. Defenders should continue to block the domain at network perimeter and DNS layers, monitor for any resurrection of the IP address, and consider adding the associated IP and name servers to deny lists. Ongoing observation of the Let’s Encrypt certificate renewal and any re‑registration attempts is advised. The combination of low trust scores, confirmed vendor detections, and blocklist inclusion justifies maintaining the elevated risk rating until the infrastructure is fully dismantled.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.lytehosting.comdns2.lytehosting.comdns3.lytehosting.comdns4.lytehosting.comLocation describes the IP network.
06c640c31e23202edc37f7234fc28d8b12d9082a90e466ba78d4de13af565e22interbfacilities.online.tandeminternational.livewww.interbfacilities.online.tandeminternational.liveSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of interbfacilities.online · checked May 19, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='interbfacilities.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnect
interbfacilities.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
2 detections engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceinterbfacilities.online
View sourcePD-20260519-78D877
コミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2026年5月19日
PD-20260519-78D877 Recipient: abuse@whiteprivacy.com Registrar: Namecheap Inc (United States) Policy Violations: Domain Registration Agreement prohibits hacking, misuse of domain to conduct attacks, scam and fraudulent activities; AUP allows immediate suspension Applicable Laws: CFAA 18 U.S.C. §1030, Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. §1343, CAN-SPAM Act
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
interbfacilities.online)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.