VirusTotal
5 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く“IndexFlow — URL İndeksleme, Reklam Kampanyası ve AI SEO Tema Üretici”
Ethereumなりすまし: indexflower.com — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 5/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar)…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
5 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
indexflower.com presents itself as IndexFlow, a Turkish-language service promising URL indexing, ad campaigns and an AI SEO theme generator. PhishDestroy classifies it as an impersonation phishing page aimed at site owners, SEO freelancers and digital marketers. We first flagged it on 2026-09-05, and as of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving its content. The page title advertises an SEO tooling service rather than anything financial, while our classification is impersonation phishing.
Impersonation pages like this borrow the name and look of a legitimate-sounding tool so visitors trust them with logins, payments or account access. An SEO and indexing pitch is a natural lure: to "index" URLs or run campaigns, victims are often asked to sign in, connect search-console or advertising accounts, or pay for credits up front. Anyone who complies can lose the credentials they typed, the money they paid, or control of the web and ad accounts they linked.
Five of 92 VirusTotal engines flag the domain: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar, as checked on 2026-10-19. That is a modest count, but it comes from several unrelated reputation and threat-intel vendors rather than a single source. The domain also appears in four AlienVault OTX community pulses. Beyond our own blocklist, it is not yet listed on other major blocklists, so many browsers and filters may still let it through.
The domain was registered on 2026-05-20 through Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a Trustname.com. That was roughly three and a half months before we detected it, which leaves room for the site to be built out and promoted before drawing attention. It sits behind Cloudflare's network, geolocated to Canada, so the address visitors see belongs to the proxy rather than the server actually hosting the page.
If you signed in on indexflower.com, change that password wherever you reuse it and turn on two-factor authentication. If you connected Google, analytics or advertising accounts, remove the third-party access from those accounts' security settings and check for unfamiliar users or campaigns. If you paid by card, ask your bank to dispute the charge and watch for further debits. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level and search logs for any staff who visited or submitted forms there.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
https://t.me/AvukatAhmetYilmazStored page referenceIoC extraction recorded 2026-09-05 04:00:15 UTC
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
elias.ns.cloudflare.comtessa.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
a7432120ac7dc6e9e6971b11e352062a7d2cf7eaa01b7f20040733a9fbee0169Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of indexflower.com · checked Sep 5, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
5→Observation retained
到達可能
5/92 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceindexflower.com
View sourcePage captured
View source保存された類似ドメイン:52 件
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
indexflower.com
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
indexflower.com)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.