VirusTotal
6 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く“www.adobe.com”
Adobeなりすまし: hiring-adobe.us — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 301). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 6/89 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
6 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
hiring-adobe.us is a phishing site that impersonates Adobe. Its name frames it as a recruitment portal, so it targets job seekers who believe they are applying for a position or completing onboarding with the company. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-08-31. As of 2026-10-19 the domain was still live and redirecting visitors, so it remains an active lure.
The page title displays Adobe's own official web address, so a visitor glancing at the browser tab sees what looks like the genuine company site rather than a lookalike domain. Fake hiring pages of this kind usually ask applicants to sign in with an Adobe or email account, or to submit identity documents, contact details and banking information for "payroll setup." Some schemes follow up by demanding fees or equipment purchases to finalise the job. The victim can lose account access, personal data that enables identity fraud, and any money sent to the supposed recruiter.
When checked on 2026-09-14, six of 89 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. That is a modest count, so many browsers and filters may not warn visitors on their own. The domain is also listed on the PhishDestroy, MetaMask and SEAL blocklists. It appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which shows other researchers have tracked it independently.
The domain was registered through Dynadot Inc on 2026-07-21, 41 days before PhishDestroy detected it. That short gap fits the pattern of a disposable phishing domain set up for a single campaign. Traffic runs through Cloudflare's network, geolocated to Canada, which hides the server actually serving the content. The HTTPS padlock comes from a Google Trust Services certificate, so a secure connection says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you entered an Adobe or email password here, change it immediately, sign out of all active sessions and turn on two-factor authentication. Do the same for every other account where you reused that password. If you shared identity documents, a tax number or bank details, contact your bank, consider a credit freeze or fraud alert, and send no payments to the "recruiter." Genuine Adobe vacancies are published only through the company's official careers channels. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and email gateways and flag recruitment messages that reference it.
Last checked
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
anastasia.ns.cloudflare.compete.ns.cloudflare.comemx.mail.rupriority 10Location describes the IP network.
acc5dbcf3b70ae5e79f70c1a0380d2fbafa99abd6660abdc08de7e8e9336bca9Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of hiring-adobe.us · checked Aug 31, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
redirect: raw=redirect_301; http=301; via=https_proxy; location=https://adobe.com/; server=cloudflare
hiring-adobe.us
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
2→3
到達可能
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source6/89 engine detections
View sourcehiring-adobe.us
View sourcePage captured
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
hiring-adobe.us)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.