VirusTotal
13 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開くフィッシング: go.foapux.com — 未検証. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 13/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); URLScan malicious verdict; Spamhaus…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
13 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開くDBL_PHISH
悪意あり
レポートを開くno community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
go.foapux.com is a crypto-themed impersonation phishing page that poses as a legitimate service to get cryptocurrency users to hand over money, credentials or wallet access. Its page title is only an ellipsis, so the browser tab gives no brand name, and urlscan.io classified the content as a generic crypto scam. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-29. As of 2026-10-19 the server still responded, but the domain's DNS no longer delivered the scam content.
Impersonation pages like this copy the look of a trusted crypto platform, such as an exchange, wallet or investment dashboard, and rely on the victim not checking the address bar. Once trust is established, the page asks the visitor to log in, enter a recovery phrase, connect a wallet, or send a deposit or "verification" payment. Anything typed in goes to the operators. Any crypto sent or any wallet permission signed can be emptied quickly, and blockchain transfers cannot be reversed.
On 2026-10-01, 13 of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain, including BitDefender, ESET, Kaspersky, Fortinet, G-Data, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, CRDF and alphaMountain.ai. Several major antivirus vendors independently reached the same conclusion, which gives the classification weight even though most engines stayed silent. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict tagged as a crypto scam. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL under the phishing category, and PhishDestroy blocks it.
The domain was registered on 2026-06-26 through Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a Trustname.com, about three months before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap fits a domain kept in reserve or used quietly before wider exposure. It is hosted at 62.60.226.245 on the FEMO IT SOLUTIONS LIMITED network in Germany, and its certificate comes from Let's Encrypt. The padlock this produces says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you entered a password or email on this page, change it on the real service right away and turn on app-based 2FA. If you typed a seed phrase, treat that wallet as compromised and move the remaining funds to a new wallet created on a clean device. If you connected a wallet or signed transactions, review and revoke the token approvals you granted. If you sent crypto, record the transaction hashes and report them to the platform the site imitated and to local authorities, and ignore anyone who offers to "recover" the funds for a fee. Defenders should block the domain and the hosting IP at DNS and proxy level and search logs for users who reached it.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
katja.ns.cloudflare.comyisroel.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
e7109da090b295a0e8069c1cfc13f51071756749262a50336164814a5e6bfe2aSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→live_content
content_served
live_content→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
13→13
No threat flag
View source13/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourcego.foapux.com
View sourceコミュニティ報告:1 件
カテゴリOTHER
Suspected abuse at foapux.com
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
go.foapux.com
“Suspected abuse at foapux.com”
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
go.foapux.com)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.