Analysis of genesis-monad.events, observed on July 24, 2026, indicates a high‑risk brand‑impersonation campaign targeting Gmail users. The domain resolves to IP 142.250.181.228, which belongs to AS15169 Google LLC and is geolocated in the United States. DNS resolution is served by Cloudflare with the authoritative nameservers brenna.ns.cloudflare.com and hassan.ns.cloudflare.com, and the domain was registered through Cloudflare, Inc. The TLS certificate presented is issued by Google Trust Services under the WE1 designation, which is typical for legitimate Google services but does not guarantee authenticity of the hosting site. An HTTP request returns a 403 status code, and the page title reported by passive measurements is “Google,” matching the targeted brand.
Reputation checks show that the domain is listed on one security blocklist and is flagged by Google Safe Browsing for social‑engineering content. VirusTotal analysis records 11 of 95 security vendors marking the domain as malicious, and the site is actively blocked by the PhishDestroy filtering service. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 out of 100, reinforcing the malicious assessment. The only technology identified is Cloudflare, which is commonly used by both legitimate and illicit operators.
The evidence points to a deliberate attempt to lure Gmail users by mimicking Google branding, yet the site is currently offline, limiting real‑time observation. Defenders should continue to block the domain at perimeter and DNS layers, monitor for any re‑registration attempts, and add the IP address to threat‑intel feeds. Additional scrutiny of related subdomains and any future TLS certificates issued for this FQDN is recommended, as well as periodic re‑scanning to capture potential changes in hosting or content.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月11日score 25/1002 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://genesis-monad.events/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
