The domain foundation.minra.network was associated with a fraudulent scheme impersonating the Mira Foundation brand, classified as an NFT scam. This site posed a threat by likely attempting to deceive users into connecting cryptocurrency wallets or making payments under false pretenses related to non-fungible tokens, leading to potential financial loss and credential theft.
Technical evidence from VirusTotal shows 9 out of 95 security vendors flagged the domain as malicious, including CyRadar, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, and Gridinsoft. The domain is registered through Cloudflare, Inc., hosted at IP address 172.67.175.72 (United States, AS13335 Cloudflare), and uses an SSL certificate issued by SSL Corporation via Cloudflare TLS Issuing ECC CA 3. The site is listed on 2 blocklists and received a GridinSoft trust score of 0 out of 100 and a ScamAdviser trust score of 1 out of 100.
As of the data provided, the domain is currently down or offline. The risk level is high, given the low trust scores, multiple vendor detections, and the nature of the NFT scam, though the immediate threat is mitigated by the site's unavailability.
For the registrable domain minra.network behind this subdomain, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Certificate fingerprint655094ee6d67f4df84c79943cd74d50a896b6cd11a2904c9f6112a587e3497f8Certificate names · 1 SANs
minra.network
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of foundation.minra.network· checked Apr 26, 2026
100
Good
Performance
FCP
0.77s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
0.77s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
0ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
0.77s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details1
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
timeout: raw=timeout; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='foundation.minra.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by ConnectTi
foundation.minra.network
Stored observation history6
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
