ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@globaldomaingroup.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
fortlike.cfd presents itself as "Fortnite Rank & Locker Value Checker – Free Tool | Fortlike". It is an impersonation phishing page aimed at Fortnite players who want to see how much their skins and cosmetics are worth. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-19. On 2026-10-19 the domain was still answering, but its DNS no longer pointed at active content.
How the scam works
Fake locker-value and rank checkers rely on a simple hook: players are curious what their collection is worth, and a free tool feels harmless. To produce the promised valuation, pages like this usually ask the visitor to sign in with their Epic Games account or approve a login prompt. Those credentials, or the session they unlock, go straight to the operators. A hijacked account with a valuable locker can be resold, stripped of linked payment methods, or used for unauthorized purchases, and the real owner is often locked out after the email or password is changed.
Evidence
Eleven of 91 engines on VirusTotal flagged the domain as of 2026-09-30. The flagging vendors include alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet and G-Data. Spamhaus lists the domain on its DBL as spam, which is separate from the antivirus verdicts. Four AlienVault OTX pulses reference the domain, so other researchers have tracked it independently. PhishDestroy carries it on its own blocklist.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-07-17 through Global Domain Group LLC, about two months before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap fits a site that had time to collect traffic before it was reported. It sits on a cheap, throwaway-friendly .cfd name and is hosted at 46.29.26.38 on the M/S ROBI TRADERS network in Turkey. Its Let's Encrypt certificate means the browser padlock showed up automatically and says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
What to do
If you signed in or approved a login through this site, change your Epic Games password right away and turn on two-factor authentication. Sign out of all sessions and check that the account email and linked console or platform accounts are still yours. Look over recent V-Bucks and store purchases and saved payment methods, and contact Epic support if anything was changed. If you reuse that password anywhere else, change it there too. Defenders should block the domain and the hosting IP, and watch for lookalike "locker checker" domains aimed at gaming communities.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年9月19日score 98/1005 brand signals
Submitted URLhttps://fortlike.cfd/
Favicon Hash
ケース ID
SHORTDOTゾーン · 公開証拠.cfd
ShortDot zone evidence
The linked repository preserves daily zone observations across seven ShortDot-operated TLDs, including registration volume and abuse-related indicators. This registry context is supporting background and is not an independent detection for the domain in this report.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-20 10:07:10 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-09 10:12:21 UTClast content: 2026-10-09 10:12:21 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-10-09 20:20:42 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-10-09 10:12:21 UTC → 2026-10-09 20:20:42 UTC · 10.14hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-10-09 15:16:31 UTC · precision medium · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
