ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@spaceship.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 13 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
fortix.wtf is a suspicious domain on the PhishDestroy blocklist, first seen by PhishDestroy on 2026-10-06. It does not openly imitate any brand. Its only visible page title is the generic word "Loading", which gives visitors nothing to judge it by. As of 2026-10-19 the host was still responding, but DNS for its content was inactive, so the page may not load now. The domain itself remains registered and can be pointed back at a live page at any time.
How the scam works
PhishDestroy has not yet tied this domain to a specific scheme, and the page title shows only a loading screen rather than any branded content. A placeholder title like this means the real content appears only after the page runs its scripts, so the title says nothing about what the site actually asks of visitors. The risk the evidence points to is a page that can prompt visitors to enter credentials or connect a crypto wallet without stating who runs it. Any request to sign, approve or type a recovery phrase on a page like this should be treated as an attempt at theft.
Evidence
Support from other sources is limited. On 2026-10-19, VirusTotal showed 4 of 92 engines flagging the domain: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and SOCRadar. These four vendors run separate detection systems, so their agreement carries some weight. The domain also appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which means other researchers have independently linked it to malicious activity. PhishDestroy is the only blocklist currently carrying it.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-07-29 through Spaceship, Inc., about ten weeks before PhishDestroy detected it. Registering a domain and leaving it unused for weeks before putting it to work is a common way to get past filters that distrust brand-new domains. The server sits on a network registered to M/S Robi Traders in Bangladesh, while the IP address itself is located in Finland. Its Let's Encrypt certificate is free and issued automatically, so the browser padlock proves nothing about who operates the site.
What to do
If you visited fortix.wtf and connected a wallet, check that wallet's token approvals in a trusted revoke tool and cancel any you do not recognise. If you entered a seed phrase, assume the wallet is compromised and move your funds to a new wallet created from scratch. If you typed a password, change it everywhere you reused it and turn on app-based 2FA. Defenders should block the domain and its IP at DNS and proxy level. Because the domain can come back online, they should also watch for it resolving again.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-20 10:06:46 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-09 10:07:13 UTClast content: 2026-10-09 10:07:13 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-10-09 20:20:42 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-10-09 10:07:13 UTC → 2026-10-09 20:20:42 UTC · 10.22hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-10-09 15:13:57 UTC · precision medium · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Recorded subdomains1
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.fortix.wtfDomain record
The original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
