VirusTotal
12 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@forticore.digital.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 13 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
フィッシング: fnval.net — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 12/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Emsisoft, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet); URLQuery 2…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
12 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く2 det.
レポートを開く悪意あり
レポートを開くDBL_SPAM
no community references
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
fnval.net is a suspicious domain on the PhishDestroy blocklist. Its page shows nothing more than the title "Loading" and gives no visible brand or purpose. PhishDestroy first detected it on 2026-10-06, five days after registration. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving live content.
A page titled only "Loading" reveals very little on its own. It does not identify a brand, a product or a specific scheme. Placeholder pages like this often act as a front step that loads or redirects to other content, which can include phishing forms, fake crypto services or malicious downloads. Twelve security engines and a Spamhaus spam listing point to that kind of risk, so any prompt this domain shows should be treated as hostile. That includes requests for logins, seed phrases, wallet connections or payments.
On 2026-10-07 VirusTotal showed 12 of 92 engines flagging the domain. The vendors include Kaspersky, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Emsisoft, CRDF, alphaMountain.ai and LevelBlue. That is a meaningful minority from well-known vendors, so the warning is not a single outlier. Spamhaus also lists the domain in its DBL as a spam domain, which means it has turned up in unsolicited mail or link campaigns. PhishDestroy carries it on its blocklist.
The domain was registered on 2026-10-01 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. and was being flagged within a week. That short gap is typical of throwaway domains set up for quick campaigns. It resolves to an IP geolocated in Finland, on a network registered to M/S Robi Traders in Bangladesh. That mismatch between the server's location and the network owner's country is worth noting for defenders tracing related hosts. The certificate comes from Let's Encrypt, so the browser padlock only means the connection is encrypted and says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you reached fnval.net through an email, message or ad, close the page and do not interact with anything it loads. If you typed a password there, change it wherever you reuse it and turn on two-factor authentication. If you entered a seed phrase or signed anything in a wallet, treat that wallet as exposed and move your funds to a new one. Scan any file downloaded from the site before opening it. Security teams should block the domain and its IP at DNS and proxy level and search mail logs for links to it.
a.dnspod.comb.dnspod.comc.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
3bd88d559edbaef10cc4b20102123c924b2c61eea785ca4a54d595ac031786f5Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of fnval.net · checked Oct 6, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source12/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261006-4B7E44
Page captured
View sourcefnval.net
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
fnval.net
PD-20261006-4B7E44 Recipient: abuse@forticore.digital Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
fnval.net)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.