VirusTotal
6 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“FedTrust Bank”
Baseなりすまし: fedtru.online — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 6/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 78/100.…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
6 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開くno community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開く68/100
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くPage capture
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain fedtru.online is a confirmed phishing site engaged in brand impersonation, specifically targeting users of the Base platform. It presented itself as 'FedTrust Bank' but had no affiliation with any legitimate financial institution or Base. At the time of analysis, fedtru.online has been taken offline, though it previously posed an elevated risk of credential theft through fraudulent login pages. No crypto drainer kit was detected on the site.
Technical indicators show that fedtru.online was flagged by 2 of 95 VirusTotal security vendors, including Netcraft and Webroot. The domain was registered through Global Domain Group LLC on July 31, 2025, and resolved to the IP address 163.61.188.5, hosted on AS153568 NEW DHAKA HARDWARE in the US. It appeared on 1 security blocklist (PhishDestroy) and had no SSL certificate. The site used LiteSpeed and HTTP/3 technologies, and its nameservers were dns1.lytehosting.com, dns2.lytehosting.com, dns3.lytehosting.com, and dns4.lytehosting.com. Gridinsoft assigned it a trust score of 0/100.
Users who interacted with fedtru.online should immediately change any passwords entered on the site, enable two-factor authentication on their Base and other accounts, and monitor for unauthorized transactions or login attempts. Report the phishing domain to the impersonated brand’s security team, as well as to platforms like Google Safe Browsing, PhishTank, or the Anti-Phishing Working Group. If financial or personal data was exposed, consider contacting relevant institutions to secure accounts and review recent activity for signs of fraud.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.lytehosting.comdns2.lytehosting.comdns3.lytehosting.comdns4.lytehosting.comLocation describes the IP network.
8d9ab20c57146d21aeb27877353a18ab57845d2457e4adffcd494522a9b882971yokltnrz5.cyou575beto.com6666119goodl.sbs91748.sbsabcgroup.ioability.soaes.vcaeyecrown.comanfvxas1584.vipanyafulugochukwuchukwurah.comappliancestore.com.auappreciativechan.combiocreatine.combotonet.combvercka1072.vipcallstewart.comcasperequpt.comcatboxx.moeccc5515.topccc5792.topccc7237.topccc8565.topccc9351.topcchagentic.comcdshfap1494.vipcryptotradingx.comcutetrends.comdalahandriving.comdepotsey.comdrparmar.comecb26b1e8bf0860c.comgij.inheirloom.uk.comhoco.aehwagentic.cominnovativebugrepellent.comjazascore.comkzkyr3.topscamdetector.appsportsmania.blogsts.companysummability.comsuperspin.cotgaeiwc.us.comSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='fedtru.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("
fedtru.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
到達可能→利用不可
利用不可→到達可能
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/e523b2ef-913e-46b7-b317-05b03559d88a
到達可能→利用不可
6/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcefedtru.online
View source保存された類似ドメイン:151 件
151 件中 100 件を表示
コミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2025年8月7日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
fedtru.online)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.