VirusTotal
17 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く“404: NOT_FOUND”
Facebookなりすまし: facebook-verification-badge.com — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 308). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 17/89 (Criminal IP, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
17 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開くDBL_PHISH
4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
facebook-verification-badge.com is an impersonation phishing site built around the Facebook brand. Its name targets page owners, creators and businesses who want the blue verification badge. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-06. As of 2026-10-19 the domain was still alive and answering requests with a redirect, so it remains usable for phishing.
Badge-themed phishing usually starts with a message warning that a page will be restricted, or offering verification if the owner confirms their details. The victim is sent to a lookalike Facebook form that asks for login credentials, two-factor codes and sometimes ID documents or payment details. The attackers then take over the account, lock out the owner, and use the page for scams or resell it. The page title currently reads "404: NOT_FOUND", while we classify the domain as a Facebook impersonation phishing page.
When VirusTotal last checked on 2026-09-17, 17 of 89 security engines flagged the domain. Those engines included BitDefender, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Criminal IP, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, CyRadar and the Vietnamese anti-scam project Chong Lua Dao. That is broad agreement across unrelated vendors. Spamhaus lists the domain on its DBL with a phishing designation, which blocks it in many mail filters. It also appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses and on the PhishDestroy blocklist.
The domain was registered through Name.com, Inc. on 2026-06-23, about 75 days before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap suggests it was set up in advance rather than used the moment it was registered. It resolves to an address on Amazon's network in the United States. Large cloud hosting like this lets operators move or rebuild a site quickly.
Facebook does not grant verification through outside websites, so treat any badge offer that leads here as fraudulent. If you entered your Facebook login, change the password right away and also change it anywhere else you reused it. Turn on or reset two-factor authentication, log out all unknown sessions in Security settings, and check that your recovery email and phone number are still yours. If you lost access, use Facebook's official hacked-account recovery flow. If you submitted ID or card details, contact your bank and watch for identity fraud. Security teams should block the domain at DNS and mail gateways, enforce the Spamhaus DBL listing, and warn social media managers about badge-verification lures.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
ns2.vercel-dns.comLocation describes the IP network.
8dba1140a9554ccd5a6141b6644533f388852c21e7dbb24b8d7121d64a9d9605Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
到達可能→利用不可
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
利用不可→到達可能
到達可能→利用不可
不明→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
不明→redirected
http_redirect
protected→redirected
http_redirect
不明→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
redirected→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
不明→redirected
http_redirect
redirected→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→inactive
http_no_content
不明→inactive
http_no_content
不明→inactive
http_no_content
利用不可→到達可能
到達可能→利用不可
到達可能
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source17/89 engine detections
View sourcefacebook-verification-badge.com
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
facebook-verification-badge.com
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
facebook-verification-badge.com)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.