VirusTotal
1 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“CBT Examination Portal | Computer Based Test Platform”
ブロックリスト掲載ドメイン: examgate.online — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 301). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 1/91 (alphaMountain.ai); PhishDestroy score 81/100. レジストラ: Global Domain Group.
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
1 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く3/14
24 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain is flagged for elevated-risk brand impersonation, specifically targeting Base through a fraudulent computer-based test (CBT) examination portal. Analysis indicates the site was designed to mimic legitimate exam platforms, likely to harvest credentials or distribute malicious payloads under the guise of official testing infrastructure. The threat type aligns with credential theft or social engineering campaigns exploiting institutional trust in standardized testing systems.
Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain was registered on July 9, 2025, through Global Domain Group LLC and resolves to the IP address 163.61.188.222. Detection metrics show 4 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal flagged the domain as malicious, while Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0/100. The domain appears on one security blocklist and was previously blocked by PhishDestroy. Technical indicators include the use of Let’s Encrypt SSL certificates and frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, OWL Carousel, and HTTP/3, which are consistent with modern phishing kit deployments.
Mitigation for this threat type requires multi-layered defenses. Organizations should implement domain monitoring to detect newly registered lookalike domains targeting their brand, particularly those using exam-related keywords. Endpoint protection should be configured to block connections to IPs and domains associated with known phishing infrastructure, such as 163.61.188.222. User awareness training should emphasize verifying domain authenticity before entering credentials, especially for exam portals, and reporting suspicious URLs to security teams for further analysis. Network-level filtering can prevent access to domains registered through high-risk registrars or those with recent creation dates.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.lytehosting.comdns2.lytehosting.comdns3.lytehosting.comdns4.lytehosting.comexamgate.onlinepriority 0Location describes the IP network.
a699499b8fb06f664b55f42bd0d1ff7957f36150af8402b2e5416e162bccd41aSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of examgate.online · checked Jun 27, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
redirect: raw=redirect_301; http=301; via=https_proxy; location=https://expireddomains.com/domain/examgate.online?utm_source=redi; server=openresty
examgate.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
到達可能→利用不可
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
利用不可→到達可能
到達可能→利用不可
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
利用不可→到達可能
到達可能→利用不可
1→4
0→1
0→Observation retained
24 community references
View source1/91 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View sourceexamgate.online
View sourceコミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2025年8月7日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
examgate.online)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.