VirusTotal
5 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く“ellevesta”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is complaint@gname.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 11 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ブロックリスト掲載ドメイン: ellevesta.top — 未検証. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 5/92 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); 2 external blocklist…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
5 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開くScan report
レポートを開く2 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
ellevesta.top is a suspicious domain on the PhishDestroy blocklist. Its page carries only the bare title "ellevesta" and imitates no recognizable brand. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-10-09. As of 2026-10-19 the domain still responded, but its content had gone DNS-inactive.
No specific scheme has been confirmed for this domain, and the one-word title gives no hint of what the page offered. The strongest signal is who flagged it. MetaMask and SEAL both list it, and those lists exist to stop wallet users from reaching malicious crypto sites. The risk therefore centers on anyone who interacts with the site using a crypto wallet. That includes connecting the wallet, signing a transaction or approval, or typing in a seed phrase, any of which could hand control of funds to whoever runs the domain.
VirusTotal shows 5 of 92 engines flagging the domain as of 2026-10-17: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. That count is low, but the five come from separate vendors with different detection methods, so they are not one source repeating itself. The domain also appears in 2 AlienVault OTX threat pulses. Its inclusion on the MetaMask and SEAL blocklists, alongside PhishDestroy, carries the most weight for crypto users.
The domain was registered on 2026-06-30 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd., about three months before PhishDestroy detected it. Holding a domain for weeks before putting it to use lets it build some age before it attracts attention. It sits behind Cloudflare, with the address geolocated to Canada, so the true origin server is hidden. Its certificate comes from Google Trust Services, an automated issuer, so the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether the site is trustworthy.
Do not visit ellevesta.top or connect a wallet to it. If you did connect a wallet, use a revocation tool to review and revoke any token approvals or permissions you granted. If you entered a seed phrase or private key, treat the wallet as compromised and move your funds to a new wallet right away. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level and check logs for past connections. They can also feed it into wallet-protection and email-filtering rules.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
kai.ns.cloudflare.compiper.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
fb69ef67778a5a82dac58f74761ca72dcbad53048cfd9281302df561d9306024Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.ellevesta.topDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of ellevesta.top · checked Oct 9, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source5/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261009-011D93
Page captured
View source2 community references
View sourceellevesta.top
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
ellevesta.top
PD-20261009-011D93 Recipient: complaint@gname.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
ellevesta.top)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.