This domain, www.fisch.club, is currently flagged as a high-risk generic phishing threat. Registered on September 7, 2025, through Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu, the domain remains active as of July 12, 2026. Infrastructure analysis reveals it resolves to the IP address 64.29.17.65, hosted on Amazon.com, Inc.'s network (AS16509) in the United States. The domain is associated with nameservers ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com, a configuration often observed in domains linked to malicious activity due to its use of low-cost or bulk DNS services. The domain lacks an SSL certificate, which is atypical for legitimate websites but common among phishing domains aiming to evade detection or reduce operational costs. A 404: NOT_FOUND page title was observed, indicating either a placeholder state, a takedown of the malicious content, or a deliberate attempt to mislead automated scanning tools. Despite this, the domain returns an HTTP 200 status code, suggesting the server is operational and may still host or redirect to malicious content. It appears on one security blocklist and is flagged by four out of ninety-five security vendors on VirusTotal, though the absence of further detections does not imply safety. Defenders should treat this domain as an active threat. The combination of a recent registration, lack of SSL, use of parking-style nameservers, and minimal blocklist presence suggests it may be part of a larger, low-profile phishing campaign. Network-level blocking is recommended for organizations, particularly those with exposure to generic credential-harvesting attacks. Monitoring for changes in the domain's behavior, such as the deployment of SSL certificates or alterations in page content, is advised. Given the domain's current state, the exact phishing target or method remains unconfirmed, but the infrastructure aligns with known phishing patterns.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-7054.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
duplicate-disabled-7054.invalid
Stored observation history1
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(CZ)
