Analysis conducted on 2026-08-06 evaluates the domain www.xeno-executor.lol, observed to be active since its registration on 2025-08-31 through NAMECHEAP INC.
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
Analysis conducted on 2026-08-06 evaluates the domain www.xeno-executor.lol, observed to be active since its registration on 2025-08-31 through NAMECHEAP INC. The authoritative name servers are ns1.vercel-dns.com and ns2.vercel-dns.com, indicating the domain is hosted on the Vercel platform. DNS resolution points to the IPv4 address 64.29.17.65. The domain appears on a single security blocklist and has been explicitly blocked by the PhishDestroy filtering service. VirusTotal reports that 15 of 91 scanned security vendors have flagged the domain, consistent with its classification as a high-risk generic phishing campaign.
The threat level is recorded as high, and the campaign remains active. The available evidence confirms that the infrastructure relies on a widely used cloud DNS provider, which can obscure the underlying hosting environment and complicate takedown efforts. No public SSL certificate details, HTTP response codes, or page title information are presently available, limiting the ability to assess transport security or content-based indicators. Likewise, Safe Browsing status beyond the blocklist entry is not disclosed, and no additional intelligence such as OTX tags or malware kit attribution is provided.
Defenders should prioritize immediate containment of traffic to www.xeno-executor.lol by adding the domain to network-level deny lists and ensuring that endpoint protection products reference the current VirusTotal detection count. Monitoring of DNS queries for the Vercel name servers may reveal related sub-domains or future campaign expansions. Given the high risk rating and confirmed phishing classification, organizations are advised to educate users about the potential lure and to enforce multi-factor authentication to mitigate credential compromise. Continuous re-evaluation is recommended as further forensic artifacts become available.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Certificate fingerprintac55a6beda09218efc3b12e3493d4e96aa82b1bc5ebf0a728dd0becf47017f3aCertificate names · 1 SANs
xeno-executor.lol
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Three.js is a cross-browser JavaScript library and application programming interface used to create and display animated 3D computer graphics in a web browser using WebGL.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(IS)
