This domain, www.risingstarminerals.com, is currently classified as a high‑risk generic phishing site. It was created on 20 August 2025 and remains active as of 12 July 2026. The site received a Gridinsoft trust score of 0 out of 100, is blocked by PhishDestroy, and appears on one public blocklist. VirusTotal reports two detections out of ninety‑five scanning engines, indicating limited but present malicious activity.
The domain is registered through NameCheap, Inc., and resolves to the IP address 66.33.60.194, which belongs to Amazon.com, Inc. (AS16509) in the United States. DNS is served by dns1.registrar-servers.com and dns2.registrar-servers.com. The site is hosted on the Vercel platform and enforces HTTP Strict Transport Security. An SSL certificate issued by Let’s Encrypt (R13) is active, providing valid HTTPS connectivity.
The page title returned by the HTTP 200 response is “COMRS - Coopérative Minière Rising Star,” suggesting the site is masquerading as a mining cooperative. Analysis of the known intelligence links the operation to an “Airdrop Scam” phishing kit, which typically harvests cryptocurrency wallet credentials by promising free token distributions. No additional content has been captured, so the exact lure and credential‑capture mechanisms remain unverified.
Defenders should immediately block DNS resolution for www.risingstarminerals.com and add the associated IP 66.33.60.194 to network deny lists. Email filters should be updated to flag messages referencing the “Coopérative Minière Rising Star” name or containing the domain. Continuous monitoring of the AS16509 range is advised, as the infrastructure may be reused for related campaigns. Incident response teams should treat any credential submissions linked to this domain as compromised and enforce credential rotation.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-3189.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of duplicate-disabled-3189.invalid· checked Mar 2, 2026
95
Good
Performance
FCP
1.21s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
2.5s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
6ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
4.29s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details1
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
Different responses detected
content_split · unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-3189.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
