The domain www.8linkbones.icu has been identified as engaging in brand impersonation, specifically targeting Google. The threat type is classified as brand_impersonation, with an elevated risk level. The domain currently has offline status, reducing immediate exposure, but the impersonation of a widely recognized brand increases the potential for abuse if reactivated.
Technical analysis confirms that www.8linkbones.icu was flagged by 2 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal. The domain appears on 1 known security blocklist and is blocked by at least one threat intelligence provider. It was registered through Web Commerce Communications Limited and resolves to the IP address 142.250.181.228. The domain's creation date is July 04, 2025. The page title observed is "Google," which is consistent with the impersonation tactics. Additionally, the Gridinsoft trust score for this domain is 0 out of 100, indicating no trustworthiness.
Given the offline status, the immediate risk is mitigated, but threat actors may attempt to reactivate or reuse similar infrastructure for malicious purposes. It is recommended to maintain blocklisting of www.8linkbones.icu and monitor for potential reactivation or related domains. Network administrators should update security controls to block this domain and its associated IP. Users should be made aware of ongoing brand impersonation risks and trained to recognize fraudulent domains mimicking trusted brands.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月11日score 25/1002 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://www.8linkbones.icu/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-2769.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(MY)
