VirusTotal
11 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く“Weakox: Most Popular Online Crypto Casino Based on Blockchain”
Analysis of the domain www.weakox.com indicates a high-risk brand impersonation threat targeting the brand 'Base'.
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
11 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く3 threat-system alerts
レポートを開く7/100
DBL_PHISH
悪意あり
レポートを開く2 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | www.weakox.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| OpenDNS | www.weakox.com |
phishing | Phishing Block |
| Hagezi Threat Feed | www.weakox.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of the domain www.weakox.com indicates a high-risk brand impersonation threat targeting the brand 'Base'. The page title claims to promote Weakox as a prominent online crypto casino based on blockchain technology, which raises concerns about its legitimacy given the nature of the content. The domain was created on June 04, 2026, and is currently active. The registrant of this domain is Fewmoretaps OU, operating under the registrar Trustname.com, which may warrant further investigation given its association with fraudulent activities.
The domain has been flagged by multiple threat intelligence sources, including AlienVault OTX, where it has been identified in two distinct threat intelligence pulses. Furthermore, the website's SSL certificate is issued by Google Trust Services, which, while typically a sign of legitimate operations, does not guarantee the legitimacy of the site given the overall context. The domain resolves to the IP address 188.114.96.3, which has not been linked to any known safe activities, raising additional concerns.
Security analysis reveals that the domain appears on four different security blocklists and is flagged by 12 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal. The low trust score of 7/100 from Gridinsoft suggests that the domain is likely to be malicious. Additionally, it is important to note that the infrastructure utilizes technologies such as Cloudflare, potentially for obfuscation purposes. The phishing kit identified is categorized as Gambler Scam, indicating a specific focus on the gambling niche, which aligns with the site's claimed purpose.
Defenders should monitor for any traffic directed towards this domain, as it poses a significant risk for users who might be misled into providing sensitive information or making financial transactions. It is recommended to block access to this domain and educate users about the risks associated with online gambling platforms that impersonate reputable brands.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
donovan.ns.cloudflare.compam.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
c978ac7a9b15a31d92ff10cbc41f31ab9782caab34b288146860805401b372e2weakox.comSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of duplicate-disabled-247755.invalid · checked Jul 12, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-247755.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by
duplicate-disabled-247755.invalid
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
到達可能→利用不可
11/89 engine detections
View source2 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View sourceduplicate-disabled-247755.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-247755.invalid)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.