This domain, www.amazon.iam-ses.com, is flagged for brand impersonation targeting Amazon, a global e-commerce and cloud services provider. Analysis indicates the domain was designed to mimic legitimate Amazon infrastructure, specifically Amazon Simple Email Service (SES) endpoints, as suggested by the inclusion of 'iam-ses' in the subdomain and page title. No direct evidence of a crypto drainer or credential harvester was identified in the available telemetry, but the domain structure aligns with tactics used in phishing campaigns to deceive users into disclosing sensitive information or initiating unauthorized transactions.
Technical indicators confirm elevated risk: the domain is detected by 5 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal, and it appears on one security blocklist. Registered on June 05, 2025, through Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu, the domain resolves to the IP address 15.197.130.221. Infrastructure analysis reveals this IP is associated with a cloud provider, which may have facilitated rapid deployment and takedown. The domain was not listed in Google Safe Browsing at the time of analysis, but its offline status suggests mitigation efforts were successful. The registrar, known for bulk domain registrations, has been previously linked to malicious campaigns.
As of the latest assessment, www.amazon.iam-ses.com is offline, reducing immediate exposure risk. However, the domain's recent creation date and association with a known impersonation scheme warrant continued monitoring. Organizations should block the domain and its resolving IP at the network perimeter and update endpoint protection rules to prevent access. Users who interacted with the domain should verify account activity for unauthorized changes, particularly in Amazon Web Services (AWS) or financial services linked to Amazon. The remaining risk is classified as elevated due to the potential for re-registration or reuse of the infrastructure in future campaigns.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月24日score 61/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://www.amazon.iam-ses.com/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-1784.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(CZ)
