The domain www.luckmine.xyz was observed in a phishing investigation on 24 July 2026. Registration records show the domain was created on 12 July 2025 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. and is currently listed as taken offline. DNS resolution continues to point to 104.21.14.246, an address owned by Cloudflare, Inc. (AS13335) located in the United States. The authoritative nameservers are dean.ns.cloudflare.com and tia.ns.cloudflare.com, indicating the infrastructure is protected by Cloudflare’s CDN and DDoS mitigation services. An HTTP request to the host returns a 503 Service Unavailable status and the page title is “Server Error”, confirming that no active content is being served at the time of analysis.
The site lacks an SSL/TLS certificate, leaving the connection unencrypted and exposing any potential credential capture to network‑level interception. Reputation signals are uniformly negative. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 1 out of 100, the lowest possible rating. VirusTotal reports five detections out of ninety‑five submitted scanners, suggesting that multiple security vendors have flagged the domain for malicious behavior. The domain appears on a single public blocklist and is actively blocked by the PhishDestroy service.
The limited detection footprint, combined with the low trust score, supports the classification of the domain as a generic phishing vector. Uncertainty remains regarding the exact phishing campaign, including the targeted brand or the credential‑collection mechanism, because the page content could not be retrieved and no additional indicators such as phishing kits or lure URLs were observed. Analysts should therefore treat the domain as hostile until further evidence is gathered. Recommended defensive actions include adding www.luckmine.xyz to network and endpoint blocklists, monitoring the domain’s DNS records for any re‑activation, and ensuring that any outbound traffic to the associated IP address is inspected or denied.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-1669.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
Gridinsoft Analysis
1 / 100
(SG)
