VirusTotal
11 / 95 engine detections
レポートを開く“Swap - CoW Swap | The smartest way to trade cryptocurrencies”
フィッシング: duplicate-disabled-13295.invalid — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 11/95 (ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CyRadar, ESET); URLQuery 100…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
11 / 95 engine detections
レポートを開く100 det.
no community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くPage capture
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain is flagged as an elevated-risk cryptocurrency drainer, designed to impersonate the legitimate CoW Swap decentralized exchange platform. Analysis indicates the site employs brand impersonation tactics to deceive users into connecting wallets, where malicious smart contracts or scripts may automatically siphon funds without authorization. The specific threat type—cryptocurrency drainer—targets users of decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, leveraging social engineering to exploit trust in established brands. Infrastructure analysis reveals multiple high-risk indicators. The domain cowsepper.com was registered on October 02, 2025, through Web Commerce Communications Limited, an uncommon registrar for DeFi projects. It resolves to IP address 104.21.29.100, hosted on AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc.), a network frequently abused for phishing infrastructure due to its anonymizing capabilities. Security vendors on VirusTotal flagged the domain at a rate of 11/95, a significant detection ratio for a newly registered site. The domain appears on one security blocklist and is currently offline, though this does not eliminate residual risk. Notably, the site lacks an SSL certificate, a critical omission for any platform handling financial transactions or wallet connections. The page title, "Swap - CoW Swap | The smartest way to trade cryptocurrencies," directly mimics the legitimate CoW Swap brand, reinforcing the impersonation threat. Mitigation steps for users and organizations include immediate blocking of the domain and its associated IP address (104.21.29.100) at the network perimeter. Users who interacted with the site should revoke all connected wallet permissions via blockchain explorers or dedicated revocation tools, as drainer scripts may persist even after the site is taken offline. Cryptocurrency exchanges and wallet providers are advised to monitor for transactions originating from addresses linked to this domain and flag them for potential fraud. Due to the elevated risk of financial loss, affected users should report the incident to relevant cybersecurity authorities and consider initiating blockchain forensics to trace stolen assets. Proactive education on recognizing brand impersonation tactics—such as scrutinizing domain names for typos, verifying SSL certificates, and cross-referencing official project URLs—remains critical to reducing exposure to cryptocurrency drainer threats.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
0xA0b86991c6218b36c1d19D4a2e9Eb0cE3606eB48Format validated · Domain analysis0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2Format validated · Domain analysisIoC extraction recorded 2026-08-02 04:34:39 UTC
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
arch.ns.cloudflare.comtessa.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-13295.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by N
duplicate-disabled-13295.invalid
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source11/95 engine detections
View sourceduplicate-disabled-13295.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-13295.invalid)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.