The domain www.grokdextools.site is currently active and classified as a high‑risk brand‑impersonation site. The platform returned an HTTP 308 status code, indicating a permanent redirect, and is listed on a single security blocklist maintained by PhishDestroy. Only one out of ninety‑five security vendors on VirusTotal has flagged the domain, suggesting limited but notable detection across the security community.
Infrastructure analysis shows the domain was registered on July 13, 2025 through a well‑known registrar. Authoritative name servers dns1.registrar-servers.com and dns2.registrar-servers.com resolve the hostname to the address 216.150.1.65, which belongs to AS16509, an Amazon.com, Inc. network operating in the United States. The site presents a TLS certificate issued by a free certificate authority and enforces HTTP Strict Transport Security, indicating an attempt to appear legitimate while leveraging widely available hosting resources.
The site’s page title is "GrokDex" and the intelligence attributes it to a cryptocurrency‑focused scam that impersonates the aerodrome brand. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of zero out of one hundred, reinforcing the perception of malicious intent. Although the exact visual content has not been examined, the combination of brand impersonation, a cryptocurrency lure, and the presence of a redirect response aligns with known tactics used to harvest credentials or lure victims into financial transactions.
Defenders should prioritize blocking www.grokdextools.site at perimeter devices and incorporate the associated IP address 216.150.1.65 into outbound filtering rules. Continuous monitoring of DNS queries for the listed name servers is advised, as changes could signal further campaign development. Given the limited vendor flagging, organizations relying on reputation‑based controls should consider augmenting those feeds with manual threat‑intel updates to ensure timely detection of this high‑risk impersonation attempt.
Extracted from stored page analysis
Observed indicators
10 wallet · 1 Telegram
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年3月11日score 15/1007 brand signals
IoC Extractionscanned 2026年8月2日10 wallet · 1 Telegram IoCs
Submitted URLhttps://www.grokdextools.site/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
