VirusTotal
7 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く“Dillon Read Partner | CFD Trading — Trading on Stocks, Gold, Oil, Indices”
フィッシング: dillonreadpartners.com — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 7/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft)…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
7 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開くDBL_SPAM
悪意あり
レポートを開く7 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
dillonreadpartners.com presents itself as "Dillon Read Partner," a CFD trading platform offering stocks, gold, oil and indices. It borrows the Dillon Read name to look like an established financial firm and targets retail investors looking for leveraged trading. PhishDestroy classifies it as an impersonation phishing page and first flagged it on 2026-09-05. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving its content.
Fake CFD brokers like this one sell an image of credibility: a recognizable firm name, a polished trading dashboard and promises of easy access to commodities and indices. Victims are typically asked to register, hand over identity details and fund an account, and are often steered by a so-called account manager toward larger deposits. The balances shown on screen are not backed by real trades. When a victim tries to withdraw, new taxes, fees or verification charges appear, and the money already sent is lost along with any personal documents uploaded.
Seven of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, Netcraft and SOCRadar. That count is modest, but these vendors include several that specialise in fraud and phishing. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and matched the page to a generic scam pattern. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as spam, and it appears in seven AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which shows other researchers have tracked it independently.
The domain was registered on 2026-05-08 through Fewmoretaps OU, which does business as Trustname.com, about four months before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap suggests the site was set up ahead of time and kept running long enough to build a track record before it drew scrutiny. It runs on Contabo GmbH infrastructure in France, a common choice for low-cost virtual servers.
Do not deposit money and do not pay any "withdrawal fee," tax or unlock charge. Paying more will not release a balance. If you already sent funds, contact your bank or card issuer right away to attempt a chargeback or recall, keep every receipt and chat log, and report the loss to your national fraud authority. If you uploaded ID documents, watch for identity misuse, and be wary of "recovery" services that promise to get your money back for an upfront fee. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level and add it to filters for investment-fraud lures.
lisa.ns.cloudflare.comrick.ns.cloudflare.commail.dillonreadpartners.compriority 10Location describes the IP network.
45a2d95c79bb54ecb9ceb7aecd0dc06b3c914891df905d1d1aad83826a7440fdSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
到達可能
7/92 engine detections
View source7 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcedillonreadpartners.com
View sourcePage captured
View source保存された類似ドメイン:203 件
203 件中 100 件を表示
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
dillonreadpartners.com
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
dillonreadpartners.com)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.