VirusTotal
2 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“Dare Market”
WalletConnectフィッシング: dare.market — クローク済み · 到達可能 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 2/91 (Chong Lua Dao, Gridinsoft); cloaking observed; PhishDestroy score…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
2 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く1/100
レポートを開く1/100
レポートを開く24 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain dare.market is currently active and classified as a crypto drainer with a critical risk rating. It was registered on May 08, 2024 through GoDaddy.com, LLC and resolves to the IP address 66.33.60.34, which belongs to AS16509 Amazon.com, Inc. in the United States. The site returns HTTP status code 200 and presents the page title 'Dare Market'. Its MX record set includes two entries: priority 1 pointing to aspmx.l.google.com and priority 5 pointing to alt1.as. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain uses Cloudflare as a CDN and enforces HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS). TLS termination is provided by Google Trust Services under the WE1 certificate. Detected front‑end technologies include Three.js, Vercel, cdnjs, and Vercel hosting. The domain is served through a single nameserver entry. Reputation services flag the site as highly malicious. VirusTotal reports 1 out of 95 security vendors have flagged the domain. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 1/100, and Scamadviser reports the same score. AlienVault OTX lists the domain in one threat‑intelligence pulse. The site is blocked by PhishDestroy and appears on one public security blocklist. The associated drainer kit is identified as a Wallet Connect abuse module, indicating attempts to hijack cryptocurrency wallets via the Wallet Connect protocol. Defenders should immediately block dare.market at the network perimeter and through endpoint URL filtering. Monitoring for outbound connections to the IP 66.33.60.34 and to any Wallet Connect endpoints is advised. User education campaigns should warn that any unsolicited requests to connect a wallet via this domain are malicious. Continuous re‑evaluation of threat feeds is recommended, as additional indicators may emerge.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
1aspmx.l.google.compriority 1alt1.aspmx.l.google.compriority 5alt2.aspmx.l.google.compriority 5alt4.aspmx.l.google.compriority 10alt3.aspmx.l.google.compriority 10Location describes the IP network.
063062e6156bb17216ffdd96a8e2bedafdc014dedf899e9fb0f1283b93df0c51Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of dare.market · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
content_split · alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=Vercel
dare.market
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
2/91 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View source24 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcedare.market
View sourceコミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2025年9月5日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
このドメインを操作したり、個人情報を入力したり、暗号通貨ウォレットに接続したりした場合は、直ちに行動を起こしてください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
推定では $51 billion 2024年に違法な暗号資産ウォレットへと流出した(source). もしあなたが dare.market — 今すぐ行動しましょう。
Wallet-specific steps below apply if you connected a wallet, signed a transaction, or exposed a wallet secret.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
によると、 FBI、最も重要な詳細はトランザクションデータです:
0x5856...35985)dare.market)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.