ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@spaceship.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 2 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Analyzed domain cxvdf345f.christmas was registered through Spaceship, Inc. and created on 18 July 2026. The authoritative name servers are launch1.spaceship.net and launch2.spaceship.net, and DNS resolution returns a single IPv4 address 47.242.217.10. The address is currently listed on one public security blocklist and the domain is actively blocked by the PhishDestroy service, indicating that at least one trusted sinkhole has observed malicious activity associated with the host.
VirusTotal reports that the domain has been scanned by 91 commercial engines; none of the scanners raised a detection at the time of the scan, but the absence of a flag does not constitute a safety guarantee. No additional intelligence such as SSL certificate details, HTTP response codes, page titles, or Safe Browsing verdicts is present in the current data set, leaving the content of the site unverified. The limited evidence points to a generic phishing campaign, but the exact payload, target brand, or lure employed remains unknown.
Investigators should monitor the IP address 47.242.217.10 for outbound connections, correlate any internal DNS queries for cxvdf345f.christmas with user activity, and enforce existing web‑filter policies that block the domain or its hosting network. Adding the domain to local blocklists, configuring DNS sinkhole redirects, and scanning future email or web traffic for URLs that resolve to the same IP are recommended mitigation steps. Continuous re‑evaluation is advised, as additional scans or community reports may surface new indicators that could raise the risk profile.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月28日score 98/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://cxvdf345f.christmas/
Favicon Hash
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
