Analysis of cryptofixer.online, observed to be offline as of the reporting date, indicates it was registered on 18 November 2025 through Spaceship, Inc. The domain resolves to IP 140.99.164.68, which is allocated to Brazil and associated with ASN 396356 (Latitude.sh). No TLS certificate is present, meaning the site would have been served over plain HTTP. The page title returned by the server is “WalletConnect”, matching the declared brand target, and the domain is explicitly listed as impersonating WalletConnect. VirusTotal scans show that two of ninety‑five antivirus or URL‑reputation engines flagged the domain, providing a modest detection signal.
Independent blocklist providers PhishDestroy and ScamSniffer have already added the domain to their phishing feeds, and the domain appears on two additional security blocklists, reinforcing the malicious classification. Nameserver records point to launch1.spaceship.net and launch2.spaceship.net, consistent with the registrar information. Because the site is currently offline, content‑level analysis (HTML structure, credential‑capture forms, or JavaScript payloads) cannot be confirmed, and the exact phishing kit used remains unknown. Defenders should treat the domain as a confirmed WalletConnect impersonation and incorporate the host IP and domain into intrusion‑prevention, DNS filtering, and endpoint web‑reputation controls.
Monitoring for newly registered domains that resolve to the same IP range or share the Spaceship, Inc. registrar may help detect future replicas. Updating detection signatures to flag the “WalletConnect” page title in conjunction with the observed IP or nameserver pattern is also recommended. Continuous re‑query of VirusTotal and blocklist feeds is advised to capture any changes in detection status.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年3月24日score 56/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://cryptofixer.online/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:08:13 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-07 09:04:56 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-07 09:04:56 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 4,231.17hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-04 12:39:55 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='cryptofixer.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionEr
cryptofixer.online
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
