PhishDestroy identifies cryptobrowser.online as a live wallet-theft phishing domain impersonating cryptocurrency wallet services to steal seed phrases and private keys. The threat is presently active and under active investigation by multiple threat-intelligence teams.
This domain was flagged by 1 of 95 VirusTotal vendors, carries a Google Trust Services SSL certificate, resolves to IP 104.21.70.131, was registered on April 05, 2018 via NAMECHEAP INC, and remains absent from all major public blocklists and threat-intel feeds as of the latest telemetry. Domain trust scores remain neutral due to the absence of detections, yet behavioral indicators strongly suggest ongoing phishing campaigns targeting cryptocurrency users.
Given the active status, zero vendor detections, and the use of a legitimate-looking SSL certificate, PhishDestroy recommends immediate blocking of 104.21.70.131 at the network perimeter and disabling access to cryptobrowser.online via DNS sinkholing or host-file blacklisting. Users who may have already entered credentials or cryptocurrency wallet recovery phrases on this domain should immediately revoke all associated private keys, transfer remaining assets to cold storage, and monitor on-chain activity for unauthorized transactions. Exercise extreme caution: this domain mimics legitimate cryptocurrency wallet interfaces and should be treated as hostile.
Extracted from stored page analysis
Observed indicators
0 wallet · 1 Telegram
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年10月9日score 81/1003 brand signals
IoC Extractionscanned 2026年7月29日0 wallet · 1 Telegram IoC
Submitted URLhttp://cryptobrowser.online/
Favicon Hash
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Latest HTTP observationRedirectingHTTP redirect observed80%2026-10-19 22:29:05 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:35:31 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 6 identified
Y
YouTube
H
HSTS
セキュリティ
HTTP Strict Transport Security — forces browsers to use HTTPS connections only.
Google Tag Manager
Tag managers
Tag management system for deploying marketing and analytics tags.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
