ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is complaint@gname.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
com-p.icu is an impersonation phishing site that presents itself under the generic title "Service Status." The MetaMask and SEAL blocklists both list it, so crypto wallet users are the likely audience. PhishDestroy first detected it on 2026-09-17. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving live content.
How the scam works
Impersonation pages copy the look and wording of a trusted service so visitors act without second-guessing. A "Service Status" title fits a common lure: the victim is told about an outage, a sync problem or a required check, then pushed to log in, enter a recovery phrase or connect and approve something in their wallet. The domain name is built to sit after a familiar brand label, so in a link it can read like an ordinary .com address. Anything entered or signed goes straight to the operators, and that can mean account takeover or an emptied wallet. The title shows only a neutral status page, while our classification is impersonation phishing.
Evidence
On 2026-09-29, 8 of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, Kaspersky, SOCRadar and VIPRE. That count is modest, but these are unrelated vendors reaching the same verdict. The MetaMask and SEAL listings matter most for wallet users, because those are the groups that track threats to crypto users. Four AlienVault OTX pulses also reference the domain, so other researchers have tracked it as well.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-09-15 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. and was in use within two days, when PhishDestroy flagged it. A short gap like that is typical of a site set up for a campaign rather than for any lasting business. The site runs behind Cloudflare, Inc. on an address located in Canada, which hides the actual origin server. Its certificate comes from Let's Encrypt, so the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
What to do
If you entered a password on this site, change it now, along with any account that reuses it, and turn on app-based two-factor authentication. If you typed in a seed phrase, treat the wallet as compromised and move your funds to a new wallet created with a fresh phrase. If you connected a wallet or signed anything, check your token approvals with a revocation tool and cancel any you do not recognize. Security teams should block the domain at DNS and proxy level, search logs for earlier visits, and report it to Cloudflare and the registrar so it can be taken down.
The linked repository preserves daily zone observations across seven ShortDot-operated TLDs, including registration volume and abuse-related indicators. This registry context is supporting background and is not an independent detection for the domain in this report.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationコンテンツ公開中Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-19 22:28:59 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:35:31 UTClast content: 2026-10-19 22:28:59 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 3 identified
Cloudflare Browser Insights
AnalyticsRUM
Cloudflare Browser Insights is a tool that measures the performance of websites from the perspective of users.
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(FR)
