Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
セキュリティシグナル
Scamadviser Warnings1/100
According to Tranco this site has a low rank We tried to analyze the content of the site but failed This website seems to offer financial services but does not have a valid SSL certificate
Analysis of cloudnetwork.digital, observed on July 25, 2026, shows the site is currently offline but retains a set of indicators consistent with a brand‑impersonation operation targeting Ethereum users. The domain resolves to the Cloudflare edge address 172.67.207.174, located in the United States under ASN 13335, confirming hosting through Cloudflare, Inc. The registration was also performed via Cloudflare, Inc., and the authoritative name servers are khloe.ns.cloudflare.com and sam.ns.cloudflare.com. No SSL certificate is presented, meaning HTTPS connections would be untrusted or unavailable. The page title returned when the site was reachable was "CloudNetwork Mining - Professional Cloud Mining," suggesting a claim of cloud‑based cryptocurrency mining services, a common lure for Ethereum‑related scams.
VirusTotal scans show that five of ninety‑five security vendors flagged the domain, indicating that at least a minority of scanners detected malicious characteristics. Independent reputation services assign extremely low trust scores: Gridinsoft rates the domain 0 out of 100, and Scamadviser rates it 1 out of 100, both reflecting a near‑certain malicious reputation. The domain appears on four security blocklists and has been explicitly blocked by the PhishDestroy, Polkadot, Enkrypt, and Codeesura blocklists, reinforcing the consensus that it is being used for malicious purposes.
While the site is offline, the combination of low trust scores, blocklist presence, a brand‑impersonation tag, and the Ethereum‑focused page title provides sufficient evidence for security teams to treat the domain as hostile. Defenders should continue to block cloudnetwork.digital at the DNS and proxy layers, monitor for any re‑activation or changes in hosting, and consider adding the domain to internal threat‑intel feeds.
Extracted from stored page analysis
Observed indicators
4 wallet · 0 Telegram
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月23日score 45/1004 brand signals
IoC Extractionscanned 2026年8月2日4 wallet · 0 Telegram IoCs
Submitted URLhttp://cloudnetwork.digital/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-21 01:07:49 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-06-14 22:43:46 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-06-14 22:43:46 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 2,585.52hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-07 19:29:20 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='cloudnetwork.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnection
cloudnetwork.digital
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
