This report analyzes the domain clalm-recall.network, which hosted a page titled "Recall Airdrop." The site is classified as a cryptocurrency airdrop scam, impersonating the legitimate Airdrop brand to lure users. The primary threat is social engineering, as users are deceived into connecting wallets or providing credentials to claim a fake token distribution, potentially leading to asset theft.
Technical analysis reveals 16 out of 95 VirusTotal vendors flagged the domain as malicious. It was specifically detected by ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, and CyRadar. Google Safe Browsing flagged it for SOCIAL_ENGINEERING. The domain is registered with Cloudflare, Inc., and hosted at IP address 104.21.83.231 in the United States, assigned to AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. Nameservers are vida.ns.cloudflare.com and wesley.ns.cloudflare.com. No SSL certificate was present. The site is currently offline.
The domain has a GridinSoft trust score of 0/100 and a ScamAdviser trust score of 1/100, indicating extremely low trustworthiness. It appears on 1 blocklist. The risk level is high due to the social engineering threat and confirmed malicious flags, though the site is currently down.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:08:12 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-21 22:27:32 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-21 22:27:32 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 3,881.79hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-11 19:21:13 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='clalm-recall.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnection
clalm-recall.network
保存済みの結果
到達不能
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
