Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
セキュリティシグナル
Scamadviser Warnings39/100
The Tranco rank (how much traffic) is rather lowThe server of the site has several low reviewed other websitesSSL certificate was not identifiedThe age of this site is (very) young.The site does not allow us to analyze its contentThis website looks to be hosted by a shady service provider.
On 22 July 2026, a forensic review of the domain claimstaking.online was performed. The domain was registered through NameCheap, Inc. on 26 August 2025 and is currently listed as offline. DNS resolution points to the IPv4 address 198.187.29.4, which belongs to AS22612 (Namecheap, Inc.) and is geolocated to the United States. Authoritative name servers dns1.namecheaphosting.com and dns2.namecheaphosting.com are configured for the zone. No TLS certificate is presented, indicating that the site was delivered over unencrypted HTTP at the time it was active.
The HTML title observed reads “Binance AirDrop – Earn Free Crypto”, explicitly invoking the Binance brand and implying a wallet/seed phishing campaign that promises an airdrop. The underlying phishing kit has been identified as the “Airdrop Scam” kit, matching the title’s theme. Reputation metrics are low: Scamadviser reports a trust score of 39 / 100, while Gridinsoft assigns a score of 0 / 100, both suggesting malicious intent. The domain is listed on a single security blocklist and has been blocked by the PhishDestroy service. VirusTotal analysis returned one positive detection out of 95 scanners, confirming that at least one security vendor flagged the domain as malicious.
The risk level is assessed as elevated. Evidence about the exact page content, form fields, or redirect behavior is not available because the site was taken offline before a full content capture could be made. Defensive recommendations include adding the domain and its IP address to phishing‑specific blocklists, configuring network perimeter devices to deny traffic to the associated name‑servers, and monitoring the IP range for re‑use by the same threat actor. Continuous watch‑listing of the registrar and ASN may reveal future campaigns that reuse the same infrastructure.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年3月24日score 20/10011 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://claimstaking.online/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:08:07 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-22 19:59:41 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-22 19:59:41 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 3,860.25hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-12 06:07:18 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='claimstaking.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionE
claimstaking.online
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
