This domain is classified as an elevated-risk crypto drainer targeting cryptocurrency wallet credentials through impersonation of the Gradient Dashboard interface. Analysis indicates the infrastructure is designed to execute unauthorized transactions by tricking users into connecting wallets to malicious smart contracts, resulting in irreversible asset depletion. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain claim.my-gradient.network resolves to the IP address 193.23.118.217 and was registered through the registrar LSW-CUST-ULTAHOST (ASN: 214036). Detection metrics show 12 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal flagged the domain as malicious, while Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0/100. The domain appears on two independent security blocklists and is actively blocked by wallet protection systems. No creation date was provided, but its recent takedown suggests a short operational lifespan typical of high-velocity phishing campaigns. Mitigation against this threat type requires verifying domain authenticity before wallet interactions, particularly for decentralized applications. Users should cross-reference official project documentation for legitimate URLs and employ transaction simulation tools to preview contract interactions. Wallet software with built-in malicious domain filtering provides additional protection, though manual verification remains critical due to the evolving nature of crypto drainer infrastructure. Network-level monitoring for connections to 193.23.118.217 can identify compromised endpoints requiring remediation.
For the registrable domain my-gradient.network behind this subdomain, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Last analyzed Previous stored snapshot: 11 detections
alphaMountain.ai
BitDefender
Chong Lua Dao
CyRadar
Fortinet
G-Data
Gridinsoft
カスペルスキー
Lionic
ソフォス
Registration & observation details1
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='claim.my-gradient.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConne
claim.my-gradient.network
保存済みの結果
到達不能
Stored observation history2
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
