VirusTotal
8 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く“Cyberpunk Auth Portal”
Googleなりすまし: carding.cm — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 8/92 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet)…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
8 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開くDBL_SPAM
4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
carding.cm is an impersonation phishing site built around a login screen titled 'Cyberpunk Auth Portal'. Its name points to card fraud, and it presents itself as a gated sign-in page that visitors must pass through to reach whatever lies behind it. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-07. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving its content.
Impersonation pages copy the look of a legitimate service's sign-in flow so visitors type their username, password or one-time codes into a form the operator controls. Here the bait is the 'Cyberpunk Auth Portal' screen. The page title names no specific brand, but PhishDestroy classifies the site as impersonation. Anything submitted goes straight to the operator, who can take over the matching real account, reuse the password elsewhere, or resell the login.
On 2026-10-11, 8 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar and VIPRE. That is a minority of engines, but the vendors are independent of one another and include established web-filtering and threat-feed providers. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as spam. It also appears in 4 AlienVault OTX pulses, which means other researchers have tied it to malicious activity.
The domain was registered on 2026-05-25 through Netcom.cm Sarl under Cameroon's .cm extension, about 135 days before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap fits a domain that was registered and then held for a while before being used. It resolves to Cloudflare's network in the US, so the real origin server sits behind the proxy. The Google Trust Services certificate gives the page a normal padlock, which says nothing about whether it is safe.
If you entered a username and password on this portal, change that password right away on the real service and everywhere you reused it. Then turn on app-based or hardware-key two-factor authentication. Sign out of all active sessions, check your account recovery email and phone for changes, and watch for unfamiliar logins. If you submitted card or payment details, call your bank to block the card. Defenders should block carding.cm at DNS and the proxy, search logs for users who reached it, and force credential resets for anyone who did.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
daisy.ns.cloudflare.comdavid.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
f1a69e61c83f1ff00997831be4375cfc7298b0645daeb002b6b79f20e354aa3bSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.carding.cmDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of carding.cm · checked Oct 7, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare
carding.cm
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
live_content→redirected
http_redirect
不明→live_content
content_served
redirected→live_content
content_served
不明→redirected
http_redirect
live_content→redirected
http_redirect
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→redirected
http_redirect
redirected→live_content
content_served
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
不明→redirected
http_redirect
live_content→redirected
http_redirect
redirected→live_content
content_served
不明→redirected
http_redirect
到達可能
No threat flag
View source8/92 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcecarding.cm
View sourcePage captured
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
carding.cm)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.